期刊文献+

李壁《王荆文公诗笺注》误收五首考述

LI Bi Wang Jing Wen Gong Poetry Paper Note Receives by Mistake Five to Test States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 李壁《王荆文公诗笺注》所收集的王诗,虽比《临川先生文集》多出72首,但其中明显有误收。对其中一些误收的作品进行探讨,是必要的。不过综观学界已有的讨论,大都均以直接判定为多,而以分析说理为少。这样的讨论往往显得猜测有余而研究不足,令人觉得说服力不强。一般而言,判断一篇作品是否属于误收,应当要展示出令人信服的依据来。故本文试图重在突出事实根据,对一些误收之作力求搜寻出相关的人物事迹和版本年代来,然后再以这些史实为依据,用来证明其确系误收。 LI Bi Wang Jing Wen Gong Poetry Paper Note(《王荆文公诗笺注》) collects Wang poems, although are more than 72 Linchuan Gentleman Anthology (《临川先生文集》), but obvious errors receives.The work received by mistake which to some carries on the discussion, is necessary.But the comprehensive survey educational world had the discussion, taking directly determines most as much, but taking analysis and reasons as few.Such discussion often appears with the guess to have Yu Er to study the insufficiency, making one think the persuasive power is not strong.Generally speaking, judging a work of whether receive by mistake, must have to demonstrate the persuasive basis.Therefore this article attempts again on the prominent fact basis, receives the work endeavour to some to search for the correlation by mistake of the character fact and the edition age.Then again take these historical evidence as the basis, to prove its mistake.
作者 寿涌
出处 《江西教育学院学报》 2007年第4期73-76,共4页 Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education
关键词 李壁 王安石诗集 误收 依据 LI Bi WANG An-shi Poetry Receives by mistake based on
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1李壁.王荆文公诗笺注[M].北京:中华书局,1958.
  • 2王荆文诗李壁注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1993.
  • 3朱东润.梅尧臣集编年校注:卷二十三[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980;全宋诗.第5册[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1995.
  • 4朱东润.梅尧臣集编年校注:卷十六[M]:上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 5朱东润.梅尧臣集编年校注:卷二十一[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 6朱东润.梅尧臣集编年校注:卷二十二[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 7朱东润.梅尧臣集编年校注:卷二十三[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 8朱东润.梅尧臣集编年校注:卷二十六[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 9华阳集:卷三[M].全宋诗:第9册[M]:北京:北京大学出版社,1992.
  • 10郑獬.郧溪集:卷二十七[M].全宋诗:第10册[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部