期刊文献+

关于利息税的是是非非

On interest tax of bank deposit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自1999年11月恢复开征利息所得税后的近八年间,人们一直在观察和感受利息税所引起的各种变化。时至今日,宏观经济环境与八年前相比发生了很大转变,利息税再次成为人们关注的焦点,尤其是近年来,一些人大代表,政协委员和专家学者对开征利息税的得失引起了激烈争论。通过分析利息税的正负效应,深刘揭示了我国利息税产生负效应的因素,特别强调了利息税正在放大马太效应,慎重提出了取消利息税的建议。 Since November of 19919 when China began to collect interest tax from bank deposit, all kinds of changes are focused by people about interest tax. So far, macro-economy environment changes a lot and interest tax becomes a hot topic again. Especially, in recent two years, many representatives of People's Conference, members of Political Consultation Committee, and economic experts and scholars have serious debate on interest tax. This paper analyzes the positive and negative effect of interest tax, reveals that China's interest tax has negative effect, emphasizes that Matthew Effect is enlarged when China collects interest tax and carefully gives suggestions for abolishing interest tax.
出处 《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第4期30-33,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Social Science Edition
关键词 利息税 正负效应 公平与和谐 interest tax positive and negative effect fairness and harmony
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1温家宝.全国人大十届五次会议政府工作报告[C].
  • 2中宣部时事报告杂志社编形势报告[C].2007.
  • 3马宪容.CPI上涨仍然面临巨大压力[N].中国经济时报,2004-11-17.
  • 4赵晓强.如何看待目前负利率现象[N].经济日报,2004-4-3.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部