期刊文献+

急性冠状动脉综合征危险分层与治疗决策

Dangerous Layering and Therapeutic Strategies of Acute Conoary Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是临床常见的急危重症,及时有效的处理与患者的预后密切相关。是应用药物保守治疗或是早期有创治疗,一直是临床争论的焦点。目前认为较为合理的治疗策略是先对ACS患者进行危险分层,对中高危患者尽早行经皮冠状动脉成形术等有创治疗;对ST段抬高的ACS,首选直接经皮冠状动脉成形术,当然,充分抗心肌缺血治疗、抗血小板治疗、抗凝治疗及调脂治疗也是必要的,还要根据当地医院的具体条件,并结合患者的意愿和经济状况给予治疗。 Acute Conoary Syndrome(ACS) is the common dangerous severe diseases in clinic,of which effective treatment in time is closely related to prognosis of patients.Whether to carry out the conservative medicine treatment or early creative treatment has been controversial issue in clinic.Now,the reasonable therapeutic measure at present is to carry out dangerous layering for patients,invasive therapy such as Percuteaneous Coronary Interrention(PCI) should be carried out earlier in patients with middle and high dangerous.PCI also is the first choice of patients with elevated ST segment.Of course,it is necerry to have such therapies as anti-myocardial ischemia,antiplatelet,anti-coagulation and lipid modulation.We also should carry out therapy for patients in the general consideration of concrete condition of local hospital,willings and economic condition of patients.
出处 《医学综述》 2007年第18期1420-1422,共3页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 危险性评估 干预措施 Coronary artery disease Chanciness assessment Preventive measures
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献73

  • 1赵明中,胡大一,陈学英,朱天刚,许玉韵.心肌梗死溶栓疗法危险评分在老年无ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后评估中的应用价值[J].中华医学杂志,2004,84(13):1103-1104. 被引量:6
  • 2赵明中,胡大一,姜立清,李田昌,马长生,贾三庆,陈方,杨明.非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征的危险因素分析及早期干预[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(2):153-157. 被引量:13
  • 3Wallentin L,Lagerqvist B, Husted S. For the FRISC ⅡInvestigators: outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared to a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease: the FRISC Ⅱ invasive randomised trial. Lancet,2000,356:9-16.
  • 4Cannon CP,Weintraub WS,Demopoulos LA,et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med,2001,344:1879-1887.
  • 5Fox KAA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA,et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The British Heart Foundation RITA-3 randomized trial. Lancet,2002,360:743-751.
  • 6Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Pogatsa-Murray G, et al. Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment(cooling-off strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA,2003,290:1593-1599.
  • 7Braunwald E. Application of current guidelines to the management of unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation,2003,108(Suppl): Ⅲ28-Ⅲ37.
  • 8Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Stone PH,et al.For the TIMI Ⅲ Registry ECG Ancillary Study Investigators. The electrocardiogram predicts one-year outcome of patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: Results of the TIMI Ⅲ Registry ECG Ancillary Study. J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,30:133-140.
  • 9Ridker PM, Cook N. Clinical usefulness of very high and very low levels of C-reactive protein across the full range of framinlgham risk scores. Circulation,2004,109:1955-1959.
  • 10Sabatine MS, McCabe CH, Morrow DA,et al. Identification of patients at high risk for death and cardiac ischemic events after hospital discharge. Am Heart J, 2002,143:966-970.

共引文献263

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部