期刊文献+

高等教育投资回报率估算——基于西部三个城市的微观数据 被引量:12

Estimation on the Return of Higher Education——Evidence from three Western Cities in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于中国西部三个城市,7949个住户的微观数据,利用内生的处理效应模型测算了城市家庭20—35岁青年的高等教育投资回报率。经验研究的结果显示:1.现阶段青年人的高等教育投资内部报酬率大致在7%左右;按照30年工作时间计算的收入增加现值大约在8万元上下,高等教育使得月收入期望值平均增加80%。高等教育还能够使青年就业的可能性增加8%左右;2.从性别的视角观察,高等教育对于女性的回报率高于男性,女青年内部报酬率大约在8.3%(男青年7.6%);就业概率增加15.9%(男青年4%),每月工资期望值增加122%(男青年67.5%);3.如果高等教育的全部花费增加到平均6万元,则从单纯的现金流意义上说,高等教育没有增加收入的价值了。 Using the data of 3394 households in three cities of western region in China, this paper analyses the investment return rate of higher education of 20-35 years old in urban households. The empirical findings show that in current stage the IRR of higher education is about 7 % and the present value for increased income is about 80000 Yuan for 30 working years. The higher education could augment the income per month by 80% and increase the probability of employment by 8%. Compared with the young man, the return rate of young woman is higher in IRR, and this trend is the same to probability of employment and expected income. If the total cost of higher education is 60000 Yuan, the choice of entering university is unadvisable for the youth from the viewpoint of cash flow.
作者 高梦滔
出处 《统计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第9期69-76,共8页 Statistical Research
基金 北京师范大学985项目资助
关键词 高等教育 回报率 处理效应 Higher education Return rate Treatment effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献39

  • 1赖德胜.论劳动力市场的制度性分割[J].经济科学,1996(6):19-23. 被引量:119
  • 2李强 刘精明.《影响中国城市居民收入的“先赋因素”与“自致因素”》[J].《中国社会科学季刊》,2000,(30).
  • 3[10]Appleton, Simon, John Knight, Lina Song, and Qingjie Xia(2002), Towards a Competitive Labour Market? Urban Workers, Rural Migrants, Redundancies and Hardships in China, Institute for Contemporary China Studies, Working Paper. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
  • 4[11]Bian, Yanjie and John R. Logan(1996), Market Transition and the Persistence of Power: The Changing Stratification System in Urban China. American Sociological Review, 61,739-758.
  • 5[12]Benjamin, Dwayne, Loren Brandt, Paul Glewwe, and Guo Li(2000), Markets, Human Capital, Inequality: Evidence from Rural China. Working Paper 298, William Davidson Institute, The University of Michigan Business School.
  • 6[13]Brauw, Alan de and Scott Rozelle(2002), Reconciling the Returns to Education in Rural China, mimeo, Department of Economics and Center for Development Economics, Williams College, Aug. 27.
  • 7[14]Card, David(1999), The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings, Handbook of Labor Economics (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam), Orley Ashenfelter and David Card, eds., Volume 3A, Chapter 20, pp.1801-1863.
  • 8[15]Fleisher, Belton M. and Xiaojun Wang(2002), Skill Differentials, Return to Schooling and Market Segmentation in a Transition Economy: The Case of China's Mainland. Mimeo., Department of Economics The Ohio State University.
  • 9[16]Heckman, James J.(1979), Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, Vo1.147, Issue 1,pp.153-162.
  • 10[17]Heckman, James J. & Xuesong Li(2003), Selection Bias, Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Returns to Education: Evidence from China in 2000. NBER Working Paper 9877.

共引文献285

同被引文献129

引证文献12

二级引证文献245

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部