期刊文献+

简论惠栋标帜“汉学”的易学特色 被引量:1

On the features of HUI Dong's Yi-ology marking "the Han Yi"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论文分"崇尚汉易家法"、"融通汉易师法"、"批评图书易学"种"学术价值与思想意义"四部分,论述了乾嘉著名易学大师惠栋的易学研究。论文指出:一、惠栋研究《周易》,重视汉易的家法,融通汉易师法,提倡复归汉代的象数易学,体现了他对传统易学的继承与超越;二、作为经学大师,惠栋企图借鉴汉代象数易学理论来指导易学研究,既是他诠释易学当代价值的认真尝试,也是他以独特的方式延续了象数易学的生命;三、惠栋梳理汉易各家源流、勾勒其象数学特点,祛除宋儒图书易学中的臆说的流弊,成为清代易学研究的一个成功典范,具有转变当时学风与确立十八世纪经学研究方向的意义。 This paper discusses HUI Dong's (1697-1758, a famous Yi-ologist during the reign of emperors Qianlong and Jiaqing in the Qing dynasty) Yi studies, dividing into four parts: upholding the Han Yi tradition handed down in the family, fusing the Han Yi traditions passed down by different masters, criticizing Tushu (Diagrams and Charts) of the Song Yi tradition, and stressing academic value and ideological significance of HUI Dong's Yi studies. This paper points out: 1) in studying the Zhouyi, HUI Dong attached importance to the Han Yi tradition handed down within families and comprehensively fused the Han Yi traditions passed down by various masters, and advocated retrieving the image-numberology of the Han Yi, exhibiting his inheriting and surpassing of the traditional Yi-ology; 2) As a master of the classics, HUI Dong's endeavor to draw the image-number theory of the Han Yi for reference to direct the Yi studies reflects his serious attempt to disclose Yi's contemporary value, and his special effort to extend the lifeline of the image-numberology; 3) HUI classified different schools of the Han Yi tradition and gave a brief account of their features, got rid of the maladies caused by the neo-Confucian Tushu assumptions of the Song Yi. HUUs Yi studies turned out to be a successful model in the Qing dynasty, which bears significance of transforming the academic trend at that time and establishing the classics research orientation at the 18^th Century of China.
作者 陈居渊
出处 《周易研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期49-56,共8页 Studies of Zhouyi
关键词 惠栋 汉易 象数 家法师法 图书易 HUI Dong Han Yi traditions handed down within a family and that by masters Yi based on diagrams and charts
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1梁启超.梁启超论清学史二种[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1985..
  • 2惠栋.周易述[M].雅雨堂刻本.
  • 3惠栋.松崖文钞[M].聚学轩丛书本.
  • 4皮锡瑞.经学历史[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 5惠栋.九经古义[M].丛书集成初编本.
  • 6惠栋.易汉学[M].四库易学丛刊本[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990.
  • 7惠栋.九曜斋笔记[M].聚学轩丛书本.
  • 8王昶.惠先生墓志铭[A]..碑传集:第11册[C].北京:中华书局,1993..
  • 9余敦康.论邵雍的先天之学与后天之学[A].刘大钧主编.象效易学研究;第一辑[C].济南:齐鲁书社,1996.
  • 10钱大昕.潜研堂集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.

共引文献85

同被引文献35

  • 1惠栋.《本朝经学》,《九曜斋笔记》卷2,《丛书集成续编》第92册,第514页.
  • 2凌廷堪.《与胡敬仲书》[A]..《校礼堂文集》[C].中华书局,1998年.第204页.
  • 3王国维.《国朝汉学派戴阮二家之哲学说》[A]..《静安文集》[C].商务印书馆,1905年..
  • 4王引之.《与焦理堂先生书》,《王文简公文集》卷四.
  • 5章太炎.《学隐》,《章太炎学术史论集》,第347,347-348,348页
  • 6章太炎.《说林》,《章太炎学术史论集》,第322页
  • 7沈彤.《古文尚书考序》..《果堂集》卷五.,1743年..
  • 8江藩.《汉学师承记》.《汉学师承记》(外二种),三联书店1998年版,第121-124页.
  • 9焦循.《与孙渊如观察论考据著作书》,见焦循.《雕菰集》,第214页,北京,中华书局(据丛书集成初编本)影印,1985.
  • 10焦循.《致王引之书》(二),引自王章涛.《王念孙·王引之年谱》,第144页.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部