论英语学术书评实据性的特点及作用被引量：6

On the Features and Roles of Evidentiality in EABR

下载PDF

导出

摘要 Chafe关于学术写作实据性与英语口语实据性所作的对比研究,为实据性的应用研究提供了理论和方法上的指导。英语学术书评作为学术写作的一种基本形式,在学术研究领域占有重要地位。研究英语学术写作中实据性的特点及作用,不仅可以拓展实据性的理论研究范围,而且对实据性的应用研究也起一定的推动作用。通过对国际《语用学杂志》书评栏目中随机抽出的11篇书评中的实据类型和实据标记进行统计分析,结果表明:1)英语学术书评中的实据性具有证据类型的间接性、获取证据手段的多样性和证据获得的非主观性的特点;2)实据性的作用主要体现在书评作者与原作/原作者在概念化范畴内的主观间互动、书评语篇与原作在语篇间的互动、书评作者/原作者以及读者在认知空间建构中的互动等方面。 The comparative study of evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing by Chafe provides theoretical and methodological guidance for applied research of evidentiality. As one of the basic forms of academic writing, English Academic Book Review （EABR） shares important position in research field. The study of the features and the roles of evidentiality in EABR is of great significance both theoretically and practically. On statistical analysis of types of evidence and evidential markers, which are based on the 11 book reviews randomly sampled from BOOK REVIEW column in international Journal of Pragmatics, it gave the following results： 1 ） the features of evidentiality in EABR are as follows： the indirectness of evidence type, the varieties of evidence device and the non - subjectiveness of acquiring evidence; 2） the roles of evidentiality in EABR are in the form of interactivenss, that is, intersubjective interactiveness, intertextual interactivenss and the interactiveness in epistemic space.

作者李健雪严敏芬

机构地区徐州师范大学外国语学院

出处《徐州师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2007年第5期131-136,共6页 Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

关键词英语学术书评实据性特点作用 EABR evidentiality features roles

分类号 G256.4 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Chafe, W. Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic writing [M]//In: W. Chafe and J. Nichols, eds., Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ : Ablex, 1986.
2Willett, T. A cross - linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality[J]. Studies in Language, 1988 (12).
3Dendale, P. & L. Tasmowski. Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2001 (33).
4Aikhenvald, A. Y. Evidentiality in typological perspective [ M ]// In: Aikhenvald, A. Y. & R. M. W. Dixon, eds. , Studies in Evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003.
5Hardman, M. J. Datasource marking in the Jaqi languages[ M]// In: W. Chafe and J. Nichols, eds. , Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.
6Auwera, J. & V. Plungian. Modality's semantic map [J]. Linguistic Typology, 1998, (2).
7Palmer, F.R. Mood and modality[ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
8Palmer, F.R. Mood and modality ( Second Edition) [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2001.
9Mithun, M. Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian[ M]// In: W. Chafe and J. Nichols, eds. , Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.
10Givon, T. Syntax: A Functional- Typological Introduction, vol. 1 [ M ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 1984.