期刊文献+

文拉法辛联合心理干预治疗躯体化障碍临床疗效对照研究 被引量:1

A Control Study of Venlafaxine and the Drug Combined with Mental Intervention in the Treatment of Patients with Somatization Disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价文拉法辛联合心理干预治疗躯体化障碍患者的临床疗效和副作用。方法将符合CCMD-3诊断标准的44例躯体化障碍患者随机分为治疗组和对照组各22例。两组病例均给予文拉法辛,起始剂量75mg.d-1,1周后増至150 mg.d-1,并维持此剂量,疗程6周。治疗组同时联合心理干预治疗。采用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、不良反应量表(TESS)评定疗效及不良反应。结果经6周治疗后,治疗组显效率为86.4%,对照组为59.1%(P<0.05),两组间HAMD减分率于第2,4,6周末比较差异均有显著性或极显著性(P<0.05或P<0.01),治疗组起效明显快于对照组。两组各时间点TESS评分差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论文拉法辛联合心理干预治疗躯体化障碍的疗效优于单用文拉法辛。 Objective To assess the clinical therapeutic effectiveness and side effects of venlafaxine combined with mental intervention in the treatment of patients with somatization disorders. Methods Forty-four patients meeting the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders third edition( CCMD-3 ) diagnostic criteria for somatization disorder were randomly divided into two equal groups : the trial group and control group. Patients of both groups were treated with venlafaxine. They were given each 75 mg of the drug PO q. d. as an initial dose. The dose was increased to 150 mg · d^-1 one week later which was maintained throughout the 6 week treatment course. On the basis of the drug treatment, patients of the trial group were subjected to mental intervention. The therapeutic effectiveness and side effects were appraised with the Hamilton Depression Scale ( HAMD ) and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) , respectively. Results At the end of the six week treatment, the rates of excellent effectiveness in patients of the trial group and control group were 86.4% and 59.1%, respectively (P 〈 0.05 ). The differences between the 2 groups of patients with respect to the decrease in HAMD scores at the end of the 2^nd, 4^th and 6^th week were significant or highly significant( P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0.01 ) . The treatment in patients of the trial group started much earlier to exert effects than that in patients of the control group. The differences between patients of the 2 groups with respect to the TESS scores were insignificant (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Venlafaxine combined with mental intervention was shown to be superior to venlafaxine alone in the treatment of somatization disorder.
出处 《医药导报》 CAS 2007年第10期1151-1153,共3页 Herald of Medicine
关键词 文拉法辛 心理干预 躯体化障碍 Venlafaxine Mental intervention Somatization disorder
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1颜文伟(译).精神障碍诊断统计手册(第4版)[J].上海精神医学,1994,6:21-21.
  • 2吴彩云 陈学诗.躯体型障碍.现代精神疾病治疗学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,1997.372-379.
  • 3中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3[M].济南:山东科技出版社,2001.97-99.
  • 4张作记.行为医学量表手册[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,:118-119.
  • 5刘斌译,В.鲁班-普罗查.实用心身医学.北京:科学出版社,1998.7.
  • 6沈渔邨.精神病学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001. 478.
  • 7Lipowski ZJ. Somatization: the concept and its clinical application. Am J Psychiatry,1988,145(11):1358-1368.
  • 8世界卫生组织ICD-10. 精神与行为障碍分类. 临床描述与诊断要点.范肖冬,汪向东等译.北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1993.129-135.
  • 9中华医学会精神科分会. CCMD-3. 中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准. 济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.108-113.
  • 10Cassem NH: Functional Somatic Symptoms and somatoform disorders. in. Hackett TP. & Cassem NH (eds): Handbook of general Hospital psychiatry.PSG. Massachusetts 1987.126-153.

共引文献688

同被引文献1

  • 1Meoni P,Hackett D,Lader M.Pooled analysis of venlafaxine XR efficacy on somatic and psychic symptoms of anxiety in patients with generalized anxiety disorder.Depress Anxiety,2004,19(2):127-132.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部