期刊文献+

构建以学生校园经验与学习成果为高等教育质量评鉴指针之研究 被引量:13

Construction of Educational Quality Indicators Based on Students' Campus Experiences and Learning Outcomes for Higher Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,有关大学之教育质量或教育绩效之研究,多主张加强了解大学生的学习与生活过程及其收获,使大学评鉴能除了看重输入面向,亦重视过程及成果面向。研究者依相关文献,挑选"台湾高等教育数据库"大三学生问卷资料,选择合适题目作为评鉴指标,研究结果发现,可于问卷资料选出六项过程指针,作为评鉴教育质量的指针,且过程指标与学习成果,二者均可作为学生认为之学校教育质量的预测指针,因此建议可采用此以学生为本位而设计之机构评鉴指标,作为高等教育质量评鉴的依据。 Recently, research on quality and effectiveness of higher education has pointed out the importance of understanding students' academic and social involvement and gains, such as their campus experiences and learning outcomes, in addition to the input aspect, stresses the process and outcomes aspects, on the evaluation of higher education institutes. Based on related literatures, the researchers have selected questionnaire items from 'Taiwan Higher Education Survey' on college juniors for the purpose of constructing educational quality indicators. Research findings and conclusion are as follows: first, six process indicators are identified from survey data; secondly, both process indicators and outcome indicators are significantly linked to students' perceived educational quality; and as a result, this model of educational quality indicators based on students' learning experiences and outcomes is recommended for the evaluation of higher education institutes.
出处 《高教发展与评估》 2007年第5期34-44,67,共12页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
关键词 大学评鉴 校园经验 教育质量 评鉴指针 学习成果 evaluation of higher education institutions campus experiences educational quality evaluation indicators learning outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Bok D. Our under achieving college [M]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006.
  • 2陈信翰.各国评鉴动态报导.评鉴双月刊[EB/OL].http:Had.b.airiti.com/ci/upload.s/upfile/312_3_52-54.pdf,2006-3:52-54.
  • 3台湾评鉴协会.大学校务评鉴规划与实施计划:评鉴手册[EB/OL].http://ua.twaea.org.tw/data/datal.htm,2005.
  • 4张雪梅.以学生学习为中心的大学评鉴-大学生能力及其与大学评鉴结果关系初探.教育政策论坛,2006,9(4):49-75.
  • 5Ewell P T. Assessment and Public accountability:Back to the future [J]. Change, 1991, 3(6): 12-17.
  • 6Ratcliff, Lubinescu, & Gaffney. Two continuums collide: A accreditation and assessment[M].In J. L. Ratchill, E. S. Lubinesscu, &M. A. Gaffney(Eds. )How accreditation influences assessment. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 2001.
  • 7Webster T. A principal component analysis of the U.S. News&World Report tier ranking of college and universities[J]. Economics of Education Review, 2001, 20(3): 235-244.
  • 8Lombardi J, Craig D, Capaldi E, et al. America's top research universities [M]. Gainesville, FL: The Center at the University of Florida, 2002.
  • 9Pasearella E T, Cruce T, Umbach P D, et al. Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2006, 77(2): 261-286.
  • 10Ewell P T. Can assessment serve accountability? It depends on the question[M]. In J. C. Burke and Associates (Eds.), Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic, and market demands, 2005.

同被引文献76

引证文献13

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部