期刊文献+

教学专业与教师发展——美国教师评鉴指标分析 被引量:3

Teaching Profession and Teacher Development——An Analysis of Teaching Standards for Teacher Evaluation in the USA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以加州和威斯康星州两州为例,讨论美国教师评鉴制度。首先介绍美国教师评鉴制度的历史发展,以窥见一套原本以总结性评鉴为思考模式的评鉴制度,如何发展至今重视教师发展的形成性评鉴制度。其次,介绍《加州教学专业标准》和《威斯康星州教师发展与证照标准》两份文件中的理念与目标,规准与指针,及实施的流程;分析教学专业与教师发展的意义如何呈现在评鉴的流程之中。 This paper discusses teacher evaluation in the USA by taking states of California and Wisconsin as examples. First, the paper analyzes the development of teacher evaluation historically in the USA and proposes how the evaluation system has evolved from the summative perspective to the formative one. The formative perspective of teacher evaluation focuses on teacher development on the basis of teaching profession. Second, the paper introduces two documents: California Standards For the Teaching Profession (CSTP) and Wisconsin Standards For Teacher Development and Licensure (WSTDL). Goals and objectives, standard criteria and indicators, and the process of implementation of teacher evaluation are discussed. From the documents, the paper analyzes how the meaning of teaching profession and teacher development are recognized in the process of evaluation.
出处 《高教发展与评估》 2007年第5期83-95,107,共14页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
关键词 教师评鉴 教学专业 教师发展 teacher evaluation teaching profession teacher development
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Doyle K O. Evaluating Teaching[Z]. D.C. : Heath and Company,1983.
  • 2Thomas M D. Performance evaluation of educational personnel. Bloomington, Ind. : Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation,1979.
  • 3陈圣谟.美国教师评鉴制度的发展及其对我国的启示.教育研究(高师大),1998,(6):175-189.
  • 4Katims D S, Henderson R L. Teacher evaluation in special education[J]. NASSP Buletin, 1990,74(527):46-52.
  • 5Murnane R, g. Cohen D. Merit pay and the evaluation Problem: Why most Merit Pay Plans fail and A Few Survive[J].Harvard Educational Review,1986,56(1):1-17.
  • 6Arnstine D C, & Mcdowell J A. Unfair Rewards: merit pay, grades, and a flawed system of evaluation[J].Teacher-Education Quarterly, 1993,20(2) : 5-21.
  • 7陈丽珠.美国教育财政改革[M].台北:五南,2000.
  • 8吴清山 黄美芳 徐纬平.教育绩效责任研究.高等教育,2002,.
  • 9National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2006). 2006 Guide to National Board Certification. Retrieved Sept. 14, 2006, from http://www. nbpts. org/UserFiles/File/ 51049 web. pdf
  • 10Clark, D. (1993). Teacher Evaluation: A Review of the Literature with Implications for Educators. Seminar Paper, California State University at Long Beach. (ED 359 174)

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部