2Bahmani-Oskooee, M.. A Time-series approach to test the productivity bias hypothesis in purchasing power parity. Kyklos, 1992, (45): 227-236.
3Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Rhee, J.H.. Time-series support for Balassa's productivity-bias hypothesis: evidence from Korea. Review of International Economics, 1996, (4):364 -370.
4Balassa, B.. The purchasing power parity doctrine: A reappraisal. The Journal of Political Economy, 1964,(72) : 584 -596.
5Breitung, J.. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In B. Baltagi (ed) , Advances in Econometrics, (15): Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration,and Dynamic Panels, Amsterdam, JAI Press, 2000.
6Canzoneri, M., Cumby, R., and Diba, B.. Relative labor productivity and the real exchange rate in the long run: evidence for a panel of OECD countries. Journal of International Economics, 1999, (47) : 245 -266.
7Choi, I.. Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2001, (20) : 249 -272.
8DeLoach S. B.. More evidence in favor of the Balassa -Samuelson hypothesis. Review of International Economics, 2001, (9): 336-341.
9Drine I. and Rault C.. Do panel data permits to rescue the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis for Latin American countries. Applied Economics, 2003, (35) : 651 - 361.
10Engle, R. and Granger, C.. Cointegration and Error Correction : Representation, Estimation, and Testing.Econometrica, 1987, (55) : 257 - 276.
