期刊文献+

从贝叶斯主义的视角看迪昂问题

Exploration into Duhem’ Problem with Bayesian Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于迪昂问题,贝叶斯主义有着独特的视角。本文主要通过介绍多林与斯特雷文斯各自运用贝叶斯方法解决迪昂问题的两个方案,试图说明迪昂问题在贝叶斯机制中的处理方式,并且对这两个方案作出比较,认为斯特雷文斯的方案更为客观与合理。 As to Duhem's problem, Bayesianism holds a unique perspective on it. By introducing the two solutions, suggested by Dorling and Strevens respectively, to Duhem's problem with Bayesian approach, this paper aims to explain how Duhem's problem is treated in Bayesian framework, and make a comparison between the two solutions, with a conclusion that Strevens' solution is more rational and objective.
作者 张健丰
出处 《现代哲学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期131-136,共6页 Modern Philosophy
关键词 迪昂问题 贝叶斯方法 验前概率 验后概率 Duhem's problem Bayesian approach Prior probability Posterior probability
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1皮埃尔·迪昂著.物理理论的目的和结构[M].孙小礼等译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 2胡志强.解决迪昂问题:三种新方法论的探索[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2005(3):95-99. 被引量:1
  • 3Jon Dorling:"Bayesian Personalism,the Methodology of Research Programmes,and Duhem's Problem",Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,1979.
  • 4Colin Howson & Peter Urbach,Scientific Reasoning:The Bayesian Approach,Chicago:Open Court,1993.
  • 5Deborah G.Mayo:"Duhem' Problem,the Bayesian Way,and Error Statistics,or 'What's Belief Got to Do with It?'",Philosophy of Science,1997.
  • 6Michael Strevens:"The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses",British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,2001.
  • 7赵晓芬.迪昂问题及其解决[J].现代哲学,2005(1):121-126. 被引量:2

二级参考文献32

  • 1皮埃尔·迪昂 李醒民(译).《物理学理论的目的和结构》[M].华夏出版社,1999..
  • 2波普尔.《猜想与反驳》[M].上海译文出版社,1986年版.第50H0页.
  • 3波普尔 查汝强 邱仁宗译.《科学发现的逻辑》[M].沈阳:沈阳出版社,1999..
  • 4TS库恩 金吾伦 胡新和译.《科学革命的结构》[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003..
  • 5Howson and Urbach: Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court,1993 . Chapt 7.
  • 6Watkins: Science and Scepticism. london: Hutchinson and Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1985.
  • 7Polanyi: Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1962.
  • 8Lakatos: "Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Prograrmnes", in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. by Lakatos and Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1970.
  • 9Howson (ed.): Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1976.
  • 10Dorling: "Bayesian Personalism, the Methodology of Research Progrmmnes, and Duhem's Problem", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 10. 1979.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部