期刊文献+

美罗培南和亚胺培南治疗急性白细胞减少期并发肺部感染的成本-效果分析 被引量:10

Meropenem and Imipenem for Acute Aleucocytosis Complicating Pulmonary Infection: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价美罗培南和亚胺培南治疗急性白细胞减少期并发肺部感染的成本-效果。方法:采用回顾性方法,对67例分别采用美罗培南和亚胺培南治疗急性白细胞减少期并发肺部感染的效果进行成本-效果分析。结果:美罗培南组与亚胺培南组的成本分别为3 639.00、6 664.00元;有效率分别为85.29%、90.91%(P>0.05);成本-效果比分别为4 266.62、7 331.21,亚胺培南组相对于美罗培南组的增量成本-效果比为53 839.86。结论:美罗培南治疗急性白血病粒细胞减少期并发肺部感染有明显的药物经济学优势。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost- effectiveness of meropenem and imipenem for acute aleucocytosis complicating pulmonary infection .METHODS:A cost- effectiveness analysis was performed retrospectively on 67 patients with acute aleucocytosis complicating pulmonary infection treated with meropenem or imipenem.RESULTS: The cost, effective rate and cost- effectiveness ratio of meropenem group vs.imipenem group were 3 639.00 vs. 6 664.00yuan, 85.29% vs.90.91% (P 0.05) and 4 266.62 vs.7 331.21, respectively.The incremental cost effectiveness ratio of the imipenem group as against the meropenem group was 53 839.86.CONCLUSION: Meropenem has marked pharmacoeconomics advantage over imipenem for acute aleucocytosis complicating pulmonary infection.
作者 颜鲁青
机构地区 青海省人民医院
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第29期2247-2248,共2页 China Pharmacy
关键词 白血病 粒细胞缺乏 肺部感染 美罗培南 亚胺培南 成本-效果分析 Leukemia Agranulocytosis Pulmonary infection Meropenem Imipenem Cost effevtiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1哈娜,哈力,张新建.4种钙剂治疗老年性骨质疏松症的成本-效果分析[J].中国药房,2005,16(3):194-196. 被引量:17
  • 2孔晓东.药物经济学:概念、方法和应用[J].国外医学(药学分册),1994,21(1):13-18. 被引量:429
  • 3宋秉鹏,丁玉峰.药物经济学概述[J].药物流行病学杂志,1996,5(3):179-183. 被引量:306
  • 4Pamsti G, Pondonsi G, Alloni F, et al.Relationship of 24 hour blood pressure mean and variability to secrecity of target- organ damage in hyperteinsion[J].J Hyper-tene, 2000, 5: 93.
  • 5Ji H, Leung M, Zhang Y, et al.Differential structural requirements for specific binding of hon- peptide and peptide antagonists to the AT1 angiotensin receptor and identification of amino acidresidves that determine binging of the antibypertensive drug losartan[J].J Biol Chem, 1994, 269: 533.
  • 6Timmermans PB.Angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonists an emerging new class of cardiovascular th- erapeutics[J].Hypertens Res, 1999, 22( 2): 147.
  • 7Timmermans PB.Pharmacological properties of angio-tensin Ⅱ receptor antagonists[J].Can J Cardiol, 1999, 15( F): 26.
  • 8Kloner RA, Weinberger M, Pool JL, et al.Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension, comparison of candesartan and amlodipine for safety, tolerability and efficacy ( CASTLE) study investigations[J].Am J Ca-rdiol, 2001, 87( 6): 727.
  • 9Eguchi K, Kario K, Shimada K.Comparison of candes-artan with lisinopril on ambulatory blood pressure and morning surge in patients with systemic hypertension[J].Am J Cardiol, 2003, 92( 5): 621.
  • 10Landry FJ, Horwhat JD, Tomich D, et al.Felodipine as an alternative to more expensive calcium antagonists in mild to moderate hypertension.South Med J,1996;89(6):573

共引文献39

同被引文献101

引证文献10

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部