摘要
目的:探讨比较空气压缩泵吸入与超声波雾化吸入对小儿毛细支气管炎的治疗作用。方法:120例毛细支气管炎患儿被随机分为治疗组与对照组,各60例,两组均给予抗感染等常规治疗,同时,治疗组患者用空气压缩泵雾化吸入沙丁胺醇加布地奈德、异丙托溴铵;对照组用同种药物以超声雾化吸入器吸入治疗,观察病情变化。结果:治疗组加用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗效果更好,与对照组超声波雾化吸入比较疗效差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:在常规治疗基础使用空气压缩泵比超声雾化吸入治疗毛细支气管炎更有效。
Objective To explore the clincal effects of air compressor pump inspiration and ultrasound atomization on children bronchiolitis. Methods 120 children who had bronchiolitis were divided into treatment group and control group at random, with 60 children in each group, All groups underwent the anti-infection and other routine treatments, Meanwhile, the children in treatment group inhalated salbutamol, budesonide and ipratropium bromide with the accessory measure of compression aerosol, while children in control group inhalated the same drugs with the ultrasound atomization. The changes of patients' condition were observed. Results The clinical results were better in the treatment group and had significant differece compared with the control group( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Based on routine treatments, it's more effective to treat bronchiolitis with air compressor pump inspiration than with ultrasound atomization.
出处
《实用医技杂志》
2007年第28期3901-3902,共2页
Journal of Practical Medical Techniques