期刊文献+

基于诉讼防范的保险合同前期交易成本与后期执行成本权衡 被引量:2

On Weighing the Front-end Transaction Cost and the Back-end Enforcing Cost of Insurance Contract to Cope with Litigation
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着我国保险市场的快速发展和社会公众法律意识的不断提高,保险合同纠纷诉讼案件日趋增多。为此当事人须耗费大量的金钱、时间、精力,这些均计入诉讼成本,区别只在于:一方耗费的诉讼成本多一些,另一方耗费的诉讼成本少一些。不管最后的结果如何,当事人都是输家,是"双输"的结果。究其原因,是保险合同当事人没有权衡好前期交易成本与后期执行成本的关系,前期交易成本过低,致使后期执行成本高昂。 With the rapid development of our insurance market and continuous improvement of the public law consciousness, the court cases of insurance contract have been increasing day by day. The parties must consume a great deal of time, energy and money, which can be calculated costs, the difference is that one party expends more, the other party expends less. Whatever the consequences, all of the parties are losers, being double losing. The reason is that the parties do not balance the front-end transaction cost and the back-end enforcing cost properly, the former being too low, the latter being too high. The article analyses why the front-end transaction cost is too low, putting forward corresponding proposals.
作者 周建涛
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期111-116,共6页 Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词 诉讼 前期交易成本 后期执行成本 权衡 suit front-end transaction cost back-end enforcing cost tradeoff
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

共引文献5

同被引文献14

  • 1孙旭.从拟话本看明代的“隐性”诉讼成本[J].US-China Law Review,2005,2(9):39-43. 被引量:1
  • 2Groton J P, Blumenfeld A, Ratterman D. How to keep your project out of litigation, arbitration, and even mediation[C]//ClI Annual Conference-Leadership of Tomorrow: Bridging the Gap. 2005: 49-67.
  • 3Keil, J. H. Hybrid ADR in the construction industry[J]. Dispute Resolut. J., 1999, 54 ( 3 ): 14-22.
  • 4Cheung, S., Tam, C., and Harris, F. Project Dispute Resolution Satisfaction Classification through Neural Network[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2000, 16 (1): 70-79.
  • 5Yiu, T. W., Cheung, S. O., and Chow, P. T. Logistic regression modeling of construction negotiation outcomes [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2008. 55 ( 3 ); 468-478.
  • 6Richard J. Gebken II, G. Edward Gibson. Quantification of Costs for Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Construction Industry[J]. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2006 ( 7 ): 264-271.
  • 7Richard J. Gebken I1, G. Edward Gibson, P. E., James P. Groton. Dispute Resolution Transaction Cost Quantification: What Does Resolving A Construction Dispute Really Cost[J]. Construction Research Congress, 2005 : 1-10.
  • 8NIE J M, LU W X, LIU X J. Research of the Bargaining Process in Construction Claim with Discount Factor, Proceedings[C]//Intemational Conference on Management and Service Science. Beiiin,. China: IEEE. 2009:1 5.
  • 9Yates, David John. Conflict And Disputes In The Development Process: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective[D]. Hong Kong: Department of Real Estate and Construction, The University ofHong Kong, 1999.
  • 10董良峰.交易成本理论下我国建设工程争议评审制度研究[J].施工技术(下半月),2011,40(8):81-84. 被引量:4

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部