期刊文献+

中国经济周期的异质性信念与福利成本 被引量:7

The Heterogeneous Beliefs and the Welfare Cost of Business Cycles of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 当家庭对于中国经济波动具有异质性信念时,中国经济周期的福利成本是否会发生变化?本文试图对这一问题做出回答。研究结果表明,异质性信念从两个途径影响我们对于经济周期进行的福利评价:第一个途径是信念的异质性可以减小家庭的风险厌恶系数,从而增加家庭的风险容忍能力;第二个途径是信念的异质性改变了中央计划者对于经济波动的主观概率分布函数的形态。按照本文的这一结论以及相应的中国宏观经济数值模拟结果,中国宏观经济周期的福利成本比按照以往模型所计算的结果要略小些。 Does the welfare cost of China's business cycles change when households have heterogeneous beliefs about China's economic fluctuations? In this paper, we attempt to answer this question. The result of our study indicates that the heterogeneous beliefs affect our evaluation, in welfare, of the cost of economic cycles by two facts: (1) the fact that the heterogeneity of beliefs can decrease the household's risk aversion coefficients, thereby increasing the household's ability of tolerating risks; (2) the fact that the heterogeneity of beliefs has changed central planners' subjective probability distribution form concerning economic fluctuation. According to the above-mentioned conclusion and the corresponding results of the numerical value of simulated China's macro-economy, it follows that the welfare cost of China's macro-economic cycles is slightly lower than that calculate by means of traditional models.
作者 陈彦斌
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第9期10-16,55,共8页 Journal of Management World
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目号:70403020) 中国人民大学985中国经济研究哲学社会科学创新基地课题<经济增长 收入分配与公共政策研究>研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Alvarez, Fernando and Urban J. Jermann, 2004, "Using Asset Prices to Measure the Cost of Business Cycles", Journal of Political Economy, Volume 112, Number 6, December,pp.1223-1256.
  • 2Barro, Robert J., 2005, "Rare Events and the Equity Premium", NBER Working Paper No. 11310.
  • 3Barro, Robert J., 2006, "On the Welfare Costs of Consumption Uncertainty", NBER Working Paper No. 12763.
  • 4Dolmas, Jim, 1998, "Risk Preferences and the Welfare Cost of Business Cycles", Review of Economic Dynamics, July, 1 (3), pp. 646-76.
  • 5Epaulard, Anne and Aude Pommeret, 2003, "Recursive Utility, Growth and the Welfare Cost of Volatility", Review of Economic Dynamics, July, 6(2), pp. 672-84.
  • 6Gollier, Christian, 2006, "Whom Should We Believe? Collective Risk-taking Decisions with Heterogeneous Beliefs", Working Paper.
  • 7Lucas, Robert, 1978, "Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy", Econometrica, vol. 46, pp.1429-1445.
  • 8Lucas, Robert, 1987, Models of Business Cycles, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • 9Mehra, Rajnish and Edward Prescott, 1985, “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle”, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 15 (2), pp.145-162.
  • 10Rietz, T.A.,1988, “The Equity Risk Premium: A Solution”, Journal ?fMonetary Economics, 22, July, pp.117-131.

二级参考文献41

  • 1陈彦斌.中国经济增长与经济稳定:何者更为重要[J].管理世界,2005,21(7):16-21. 被引量:82
  • 2陈彦斌,周业安.中国商业周期的福利成本[J].世界经济,2006,29(2):11-19. 被引量:56
  • 3Balke,N. and M. ,Wynne, 1996, "Are deep recessions followed by strong recoveries? Results for G7 economies", Applied Economics, 28,889-897.
  • 4Barro,R. J., 1995,"Inflation and economic growth" ,Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin,35,166-176.
  • 5Blanchard, O. J. and D., Quah, 1989, "The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and aggregate supply disturbances", American Economic Review, 79,655-673.
  • 6Blanchard, O. J. and J., Simon,2001 ," The long and large decline in US output volatility", Brooklngs Papers on Economic Activity, 1,135-174.
  • 7Burns, A. F. and W. C., Mitchell, 1946, "Measuring Business Cycles", NBER, New York.
  • 8Cover,J. P., 1992," Asymmetric effects of positive and negative money- supply shocks", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 13,1261-1282.
  • 9Ginsburgh, V. and P., Michel, 1998, "Optimal policy business cycles", Journal of Dynamics & Control, 22,503-518.
  • 10McConnell,M. M. and G., Perez-Quiros, 2000, "Output fluctuations in the United States: What has changed since the early 1980' s?"American Economic Reviews, 90,1464- 1476.

共引文献173

同被引文献112

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部