期刊文献+

高层管理团队价值观共享、冲突与绩效:一项实证检验 被引量:33

An Empirical Study:China TMTs Members' Value Congruence and Conflicts,and Team Performances
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高层管理团队(TMT)成员之间的冲突能否解决,是影响企业最终绩效的重要因素之一。从理论上分析了2类不同冲突(任务型冲突和关系型冲突)产生的深层次原因,旨在超越以往过分集中于TMT成员个体特征(主要是人口统计特征)的研究倾向,探讨成员间价值观共享对冲突的影响作用。基于我国电信行业118个企业的高管团队数据,研究发现成员间价值观一致性能预测TMT关系型冲突,并传导到员工在组织中的工作感受。对企业环境变量的调节效应的实证检验发现,在企业环境竞争激烈的情况下,TMT关系型冲突的破坏性作用更大。 Whether conflicts among TMT members could be effectively resolved is one of important factors influencing firm performances. Rather than investigating demographic information that has been heavily researched in existing literature, the impact of TMT members' value congruence on the two types of conflicts (task-type and of relation-type conflicts) were examined theoretically. TMT data collected in 118 firms from telecom industry were analyzed. It is found that value the congruence would influence relation-type conflicts among TMT members negatively, which in turn, have impacts on employee outcomes. The moderating effects of firm environment were also tested. Results show that negative influence of relation-type conflicts between TMT members becomes stronger in a competitive firm environment than in a less competitive firm one.
出处 《管理学报》 2007年第5期644-653,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70401018) 香港政府研究基金资助项目(CUHK4457/04H/2004) 中国人民大学青年科学研究基金资助项目(05-122)
关键词 高层管理团队 冲突 价值观 top management team conflict value
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1[1]BARNEYJ B.Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage[J].Journal of Management,1991,17(1):99-120.
  • 2[2]PFEFFERJ.Competitive Advantage through People[J].California Management Review,1994,36(4):9-28.
  • 3[3]PORTERM E.Competitive Strategy:Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors[M].New York:Free Press,1980.
  • 4魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2000,35(3):32-39. 被引量:1642
  • 5朱红军.我国上市公司高管人员更换的现状分析[J].管理世界,2002,18(5):126-131. 被引量:93
  • 6[6]HAMBRICKD C,MASON P A.Upper Echelons:The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J].Academy of Management Review,1984,9(2):207-224.
  • 7[7]FINKELSTEINS,HAMBRICK D C.Strategic Leadership:Top Executives and Their Effects on Organization[M].Minneapolis:West Publishing,1996.
  • 8[8]ENSLEYM D,PEARSON A W,PEARCE C L.Shared Leadership,Top Management Team Process and New Venture Performance:A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda[J].Human Resource Management Review,2003,13(2):329-346.
  • 9[9]ZACCAROS J,KLIMOSKI R.The Interface of Leadership and Team Processes[J].Group and Organization Management,2002,27(1):4-13.
  • 10[10]AMASONA C.Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making:Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams[J].Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(1):123-147.

二级参考文献79

  • 1吴维库.我国知识型企业应实行以价值为基础的领导[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,14(4):25-28. 被引量:6
  • 2吴维库 张玲 等.《企业经营以价值为本》,《企业研究动态》[M].清华大学中国企业研究中心,2000,13..
  • 3Kolb Deborah M. , Linda L. Putnam, 1992, "The Multiple Faces of Conflicts in Organizations", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13. 311- 324.
  • 4Jehn, Karen A., 1995, "A Multiple Examination of The Benefits and Detriments of lntragroup Conflicts", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.40, 256-282.
  • 5Jehn Keren A. , Margeret A. Neale, 1999,"Why Differences Make A Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups", Administrative Science Quarterly, December; 741-763.
  • 6Leonard - Barton, Dorothy, "1990, "A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites", Organization Science,Vol. 1, 248- 266.
  • 7Murray, Alan I., 1989, "Top Management Group Heterogeneity and Firm Performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, 125- 141.
  • 8Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 1981," Some Consequence of Organizational Demography: Potential Impacts of Aging Work Force on Formal Organizations", In S.B. Kiesler, ere edited,Aging:Social Change, New York, Academic Press, 291-329.
  • 9Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 1982, Managing with Power : Politics and Influence in Organizations, Harvard Business School Press, p30.
  • 10Priem Richard, Kenneth Price, 1991, "Process and Outcome Expectations for The Dialectical lnquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Techniques of Strategic Decision Making", Group and Organization Studies, Vol. 16, 206-225.

共引文献1812

同被引文献765

引证文献33

二级引证文献250

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部