期刊文献+

从社会交换的角度看组织认同的来源及效益 被引量:64

Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Identification:A Social Exchange Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从社会交换的角度探讨了组织认同的来源及效益。采用结构方程建模的方法,通过对398名企业个体的问卷调查所获取的数据进行分析,结果表明:(1)POS对组织认同和留职意愿有着直接的显著影响;同时,它通过组织认同的中介作用对个体的留职意愿、同事间利他行为、个人主动性、人际和谐和保护公司资源会产生间接的影响;(2)LMX对组织认同和留职意愿没有直接的显著影响;但它对同事间利他行为、个人主动性、人际和谐和保护公司资源有着直接的显著影响。 Introduction The last two decades have witnessed a surge in interest in organizational identification (OI), which is viewed by some researchers as the sense of psychological connection or bond between an individual and an organization. Although OI is important, it remains theoretically underdeveloped and has received limited attention in China. This paper presents an empirical test of organizational identification from a social exchange perspective in an attempt to understand the nature, development, and consequences of organizational identification. Method The sample consisted of 398 employees from 32 firms. Structural equation modeling was used for data analysis. Results Results indicated that perceived organizational support (POS) had a significant impact on organizational identification and intention to remain. Further, organizational identification fully mediated the relationship between perceived organizational support and four organizational citizenship behaviors (altruism toward colleagues, conscientiousness, interpersonal harmony and protecting company resources). Leader-member exchange (LMX) had no significant direct impact on organizational identification and intention to remain, but had an important impact on altruism toward colleagues, conscientiousness, interpersonal harmony and protecting company resources. Conclusions Perceived organizational support plays an important role in determining employees' organizational identification, work-related attitudes and behaviors. However, leader-member exchange has no significant direct impact on organizational identification and intention to remain, but it has an important influence on altruism toward colleagues, conscientiousness, interpersonal harmony, and protecting company resources. These effects and directions for future research are discussed.
作者 沈伊默
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期918-925,共8页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 西南大学科技基金资助项目(编号:SWUQ2006042)
关键词 社会交换 组织支持感 领导成员交换 组织认同 social exchange, organizational identification, perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Riketta M.Organizational identification:A meta-analysis.Journal of Vocational Behavior,2005,66:358-384.
  • 2Freud S.Group Psychology and the Analysis of Ego.New York:Norton,1922.
  • 3Patchen M.Participation,Achievement,and Involvement on the Job.Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1970.
  • 4Tajfel H.Human groups and social categories:Studies in social psychology.New York:Cambridge University Press,1981.
  • 5Turner J C.Rediscovering the social group:A self-categorization theory.New York:Blackwell,1987.
  • 6Ashforth B E,Mael F.Social identity theory and the organization.Academy of Management Review,1989,14:20-39.
  • 7Dutton J E.Dukerich J M.Harquail C V.Organizational images and member identification.Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,39:239-263.
  • 8O'Reilly C A,Chatman J.Organizational commitment and psychological attachment:The effect of compliance,identification,and internalization on prosocial behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,1986,71:492-499.
  • 9Hall D T,Schneider B,Nygren H T.Personal factors in organizational identification.Administrative Science Quarterly,1970,15:176-190.
  • 10Ellemers N.The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies.European Review of social psychology,1993,4:27-57.

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1286

同被引文献1126

引证文献64

二级引证文献597

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部