期刊文献+

南宁1996-2005年生态安全评价研究 被引量:2

Research into Urban Ecological Safety Evaluation of Nanning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文根据压力-状态-响应概念模型,构建了一个城市生态安全评价指标体系和综合评价模型,并从时间尺度上(1996-2005年)对南宁生态安全的现状和发展趋势做出了评价.根据计算结果,南宁近十年的生态安全水平总体呈上升趋势,1996—2001年处于不安全状态,2002年、2004年处于临界安全状态,2003年、2005年处于安全状态,这表明南宁2002年以来在城市建设方面所做的努力使其生态安全水平有了较大提高.通过分析压力、状态、响应3项指标指数与城市生态安全指数之间的关系,发现人文响应指标对南宁城市生态安全水平有直接影响. Based on the Pressure- state- Response conceptual model, the study on Evaluation Index System of Ecological Security and comprehensive evaluation method are established. Then the application and development tendency on time scale (1996q2005) are evaluated. The calculating results show that the development tendency of Ecological Security tended to be increased in general in the recent decade. From 1996 to 2001, it was not in the security state. It is on the criticality safety state in 2002 and 2004. It shows that the hard work on the urban construction of Nanning enhances its Ecological Security development. Having analysed the relations of pressure, state, responding target indexs and the urban ecology security index, it's found that the response target has the direct influence upon the Nanningcity ecology security level.
出处 《广西师范学院学报(自然科学版)》 2007年第3期61-66,共6页 Journal of Guangxi Teachers Education University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 广西师范学院青年科研基金项目资助
关键词 生态安全 生态安全指标体系 生态安全评价 南宁 ecological security Evaluation Index System of Ecological Security ecological security evaluation Nanning
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献57

  • 1郭阳旭.城市生态安全保护对策分析[J].经济师,2004(8):244-244. 被引量:3
  • 2谢花林,张新时.城郊区生态安全水平的量度及其对策研究——以北京市海淀区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(3):23-26. 被引量:34
  • 3顾传辉,陈桂珠.生态城市评价指标体系研究[J].环境保护,2001,29(11):24-25. 被引量:55
  • 4尹希成.生态安全:一种新的安全观[N].科技日报,1999-02—27.
  • 5[1]McMichael A J, Bolin B, Costanza R, et al. Globalization and the sustainability of human health: an ecological perspective [J]. Bioscience, 1999,49:205-210.
  • 6[2]Kevan P G, Greco C F. Biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystem health: pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry health [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997,34: 1122-1136.
  • 7[3]Rapport D J, Gandet C L, Calow P. Evaluating and monitoring the health of large scale ecosystem [M]. Berlin: Springer verlag, 1994.
  • 8[4]Nordin M, Azrina L A. Training and research for measuring and monitoring ecosystem health of a large scale ecosystem: the langat basin selangor Malaysia [J]. Ecosystem Health, 1998, 4: 188-190.
  • 9[5]Pietro, Bertollo. Assessing ecosystem health in governed landscape: a framework for developing core indicators [J]. Ecosystem Health, 1998,4:33-51.
  • 10[6]Shear H. The development and use of indicators to assess the state of ecosystem health in the Great Lakes [J]. Ecosystem Health, 1996, 2: 241-258.

共引文献971

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部