期刊文献+

铜绿假单胞菌对碳青霉烯类抗生素的耐药性及其耐药表型与外膜蛋白OprD2的关系 被引量:9

The resistance to carbapenems and the correlation between resistance phenotype and the amounts of OprD2 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 了解铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Pa)临床分离株对几种常用抗铜绿假单胞菌药物的敏感性;探索铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株对亚胺培南和美罗培南耐药性差异与其膜孔蛋白0prD2变化的关系。方法琼脂对倍稀释法测定142株Pa对亚胺培南、美罗培南等8种常用抗假单胞菌药物的最低抑菌浓度,从中筛出32株对亚胺培南和美罗培南不同耐药表型的Pa,提取外膜蛋白并采用十二烷基磺酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)法分离,检测OprD2相对含量。结果耐药率最高的是亚胺培南(54.23%),其次是环丙沙星(45.07%)、美罗培南(28,87%)、氨曲南(19.72%)、阿米卡星(17.61%)、哌拉西林/三唑巴坦(14.08%)和头孢他啶(11.97%),头孢哌酮/舒巴坦耐药率最低(9.86%)。呈现多重耐药的菌株占38.73%(55/142),交叉耐药率高达40.84%(58/142)。在对亚胺培南耐药的菌株中,合并有其他肛内酰胺类抗生素耐药的菌株达到62.34%(48/77)。32株Pa外膜蛋白电泳结果显示OprD2相对含量在耐药组为0~3.5%(其中有一株为8.70%),敏感组为6.20%~10.20%。在碳青霉烯类耐药组与敏感组之间统计分析P〈0.05,耐碳青霉烯类组低于敏感组,但是在亚胺培南耐药、美罗培南敏感组与亚胺培南、美罗培南均耐药组之间差异无统计学意义。结论铜绿假单胞菌耐药菌株常见,且常呈多重耐药和交叉耐药。亚胺培南耐药率高于美罗培南。膜孔蛋白OprD2减少或缺失是我院Pa对亚胺培南耐药的主要原因之一。但在美罗培南耐药中所起的作用,有待进一步研究。 Objective To study the activities of some commonly used antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, investigate the correlation between the resistance phenotypes and the amounts of outer membrane protein (OpD2) of P. aeruginosa, and discuss the mechanism of different resistant phenotypes in P. aeruginosa. Methods The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 8 antimicrobial agents against 142 clinical isolates were determined by agar dilution method. Membrane proteins of 32 strains with different resistant phenotypes to imipenem and meropenem were obtained by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis method and the relative amounts of OprD2 were determined. Results The resistant rate of imipenem was the highest (54.23%), followed by ciprofloxacin (45.07%), meropenem (28.87%), aztreonam (19.72%), amikacin (17.61%), piperacillin/tazobactam (14.08%), ceftazidime (11.97%) and cefoperazone/sulbactam (9.86%). The cross resistance rate to β-lactams was 40.84% (58/142), muhi-drug resistance rate was 38.73% (55/142). It accounted for 62.34% (48/77), resistant to the other β-lactams in all isolates resistant to imipenem. Membrane proteins of 32 strains were isolated and determined by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis method. Result showed that the relative amounts of OprD2 ranged from 0 to 3. 5% in strains resistant to carbapenems (excepta strain which OprD2 was 8.70%); others were from 6.20% to 10.20% in susceptible strains. The statistic results showed the relative amounts of OprD2 of 27 strains resistant to carbapenems were much than susceptible strains. Conclusions P. aeruginosa was frequently resistant to clinical antimicrobial agents, the most were cross resistant and multi-drug resistant strains. Resistance rate of imipenem was higher than that of meropenem. The loss or diminishment of OprD2 was the main reason for the imipenem resistance of P. aeruginosa in our hospital, but its effect on meropenem resistance deserved further study.
出处 《中国抗生素杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第9期564-568,共5页 Chinese Journal of Antibiotics
关键词 铜绿假单胞菌 MIC 耐药性 亚胺培南 美罗培南 OPRD2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MIC Resistance Imipenem Meropenem OprD2
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Lynch M J,Drusano G L,Mobley H L.Emergence of resistance to imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J].Antirnicrob Agents Chemother,1987,31(12):1892-1896.
  • 2萨姆布鲁克 J,拉塞尔 D W,分子克隆实验指南[M].3版,北京:科学出版社,2002.23—59.
  • 3Arnow P M,Flaherly J P.Nonfermentative Gram-nega-tive bacilli[M].//Mayhall C G,ed.Hospital epidemiology and infection controly 2nd ed.Philadephia:Lippineoll Williams and Wikins,1999:959.
  • 4Sader H S.Gales A C.Pfaller M A.et al.Pathogen frequency and resistance patterns in Brazilian hospitals:summary of results from three years of the SENTRY Antimierobial Surveillance Program[J].Brazilian J Infect Dis,2001,5(2):200-214.
  • 5王辉,陈民钧,中国医院内病原菌耐药监测网.1994~2001年中国重症监护病房非发酵糖细菌的耐药变迁[J].中华医学杂志,2003,83(5):385-390. 被引量:422
  • 6Watanabe M,Iyobe S,Ioone M,et al.Transferable imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,1991,35(1):147-151.
  • 7Pournaras S,Maniati M,Petinaki E,et al.Hospital outbreak of multiple clones of Pseudomonas aeruginosa carrying the unrelated metallo-beta-lactamase gene variants blaVIM-2 and blaVIM-4[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2003,51(6):1409-1414.
  • 8Andrade S S,Jones R N,Gales A C,et al.Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Latin American medical centres:5 year report of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program(1997-2001)[J].J Antirnicrob Chemother,2003,52(1):140-141.
  • 9王辉,陈民钧,倪语星,陈冬梅,孙自庸,陈燕,赵旺胜,邹雄,俞云松,胡志东,黄心宏,徐英春,谢秀丽,褚云卓,王倩,梅亚宁,田彬,张蓓,孔庆莲,于秀娟,潘玉红.2003—2004年中国十家教学医院革兰阴性杆菌的耐药分析[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(12):1295-1303. 被引量:236
  • 10Quinn J P,Dudek E J,DiVincenzo C A,et al.Emergence of resistance to imipenem during therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections[J].J Infect Dis,1986,154(2):289-294.

二级参考文献18

共引文献643

同被引文献88

引证文献9

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部