期刊文献+

论英语情态动词道义情态的主现性 被引量:19

The Subjectivity of Deontic Modality Expressed by English Modals
原文传递
导出
摘要 英语情态动词的意义是主观的还是中立的(主观或客观取决于语境)?对于这个问题,语言学家的回答不尽相同。本文试图通过论证英语情态动词道义情态的主观性来证明情态动词内在隐含的主现性。本文认为:情态动词的意义并不与归一性直接相连,中间还隔着非情态动词情态表达式表示的客观情态和所谓的评价情态。与这些客观意义相比,尤其是与实义动词表示的零情态断言或陈述相比,情态动词总是主观的。本文还对6位学者有关情态动词主/客观情态的观点进行了评析,并从不同的语法视角时情态动词的意义进行分析,在肯定了功能语法和认知语法情态阐释力长处的同时,也指出了它们各自的不足。 Are English modal verbs inherently subjective or neutral ( compatible with either a subjective or an objective interpretation depending on the context)? Different linguists have different answers. The paper attempts to prove the subjectivity implicit in English mndals by demonstrating the subjectivity of Deontic modality expressed by modal verbs, The paper argues that the meanings of modals are still some distance away from polarity with the obj^tive modalities of non-auxiliary modal expressions and so-called evaluation modality in between. Compared with these objective meanings, especially with the non-modal assertions or statements expressed by lexical verbs English modals are unambiguously subjective. The paper also critically comments on 6 linguists' academic views about the subjective / objective modality distinction as well as both functional and cognitive analyses of modality and modal verbs.
作者 张楚楚
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期23-30,共8页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 主观性 主观/客观情态 判断/断言 subjectivity subjective/objective modality judgment / assertion
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Lyons,L.Linguistic Semantics:An Introduction[M].Cambridge:CUP,1995.
  • 2Coates,J.The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries[M].London & Canberra:Croom Helm,1983.
  • 3Perkins,M.R.Modal Expressions in English[M].Norwood,New Jersey:Ablex Publishing Corporation,1983.
  • 4Palmer,F.R.Modality and the English Modals[M].London and New York:Longman,1990.
  • 5Palmer,F.R.Mood and Modality[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001.
  • 6Halliday,M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M].London:Edward Arnold,1985.
  • 7Halliday,M.A.K.An Introduction to Functional Grammar[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press & Edward Arnold Ltd,1994/2000.
  • 8Langacker,R.W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar:Descriptive Application (Vol.2)[M].Beijing:Peking University Press & Standford University Press,1991/2004.
  • 9Sinclair,J.Collins Cobuild English Grammar[M].Beijing:The Commercial Press & Harper Collins Publishers Ltd,1990/1999.
  • 10Quirk,R.,GreenBaum,S.,Leech,G.& J.Svartvik.A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language[M].London:Longman,1985.

二级参考文献38

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:175
  • 3Bybee, J. 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse [ M ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • 4Coates, J. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries[M]. London & Canberra : Croom Helm Ltd.
  • 5Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.
  • 6Palmer, F. R. 1979. Modality and the English Modals (1^st ed) [M]. London: Longman Group Limited.
  • 7Palmer, F. R. 1990. Modality and the English Modals (2^nd ed) [M]. London: Longman Grouo Limited.
  • 8Palmer, F. R. 2003. Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues [A]. In R. Facchinetti et al. (eds.), Modality in Contemporary English [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 9Perkins, R. M. 1983. Modal Expressions in English [ M ]. London : Frances Printer.
  • 10Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics [M]. Trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gablres, FL: University of Miami Press.

共引文献2437

同被引文献239

引证文献19

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部