期刊文献+

腺苷脱氨酶、乳酸脱氢酶、癌胚抗原、肿瘤抗原19-9、肿瘤抗原125联合检测鉴别良恶性胸腔积液 被引量:6

Benign and malignant pleural effusion differentiated by the combined application of adenosine deaminase,lactate dehydrogenase,carcinoembryonic antigen,cancer antigen 19-9 and cancer antigen 125
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胸腔积液中腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、肿瘤抗原19-9 (CA19-9)、肿瘤抗原125(CA125)联合检测在胸腔积液鉴别诊断中的意义。方法常规采集各80例结核性疾病组和恶性疾病组胸腔积液,测定胸腔积液ADA、LDH、CEA、CA125、CA19-9等五项指标,并进行对比分析。结果联合检测对结核性胸腔积液诊断的敏感度为92.5%、特异度为93.6%、准确度为92.7%;对恶性胸腔积液诊断的敏感度、特异性、准确度分别为92.3%、94.6%、93.5%。结论联合检测多项指标有效地避免了单一指标检测所致的误诊和漏诊,有助于胸腔积液的病因诊断。 Objective To investigate the significance in the differentiation and diagnosis of pleural effusion by detecting adenosine deaminase (ADA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9(CA19-9) and cancer antigen 125(CA125). Methods The pleural effusion was routinely collected in 80 patients with tubercular diseases and malignant diseases, the ADA, LDH, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 in pleural fluid were detected, and then were comparatively analyzed. Results Specificity and accuracy of the combined detection for tubercular pleural effusion were 92.5 %, 93.6 % and 92.7 % respectively, whereas those for malignant pleural effusion were 92.3 % ,94.6 % and 93.5 % respectively. Conclusion The combined detection of several indexes effectively avoids the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis caused by detection of single index, and it is good to diagnose the causes of pleural effusion.
作者 罗晓璐
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2007年第8期1266-1267,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 胸腔积液 腺苷脱氨酶 乳腺脱氢酶 癌胚抗原 抗原 肿瘤 诊断 鉴别 Pleural effusion Adenosine deaminase Lactate dehydrogenase Carcinoembryonic antigen Antigens, neoplasm Diagnosis, differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献44

  • 1田会东,武继玲.胸液ADA检测对结核性及癌性胸液的鉴别诊断价值[J].海南医学,2006,17(2):5-7. 被引量:1
  • 2徐林发,叶林军,祝华君,舒巧明,吴月建.胸水CEA、胸水/血清CEA比及肉眼血性胸水在鉴别良恶性胸水中的价值探讨[J].放射免疫学杂志,2006,19(1):80-80. 被引量:2
  • 3Tas F, Aydiner A, Demir C, et al. Serum lactate dehydrogenase levels at presentation predict outcome of patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer [ J ]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2001,24 ( 4 ) : 376-378.
  • 4Rotenberg Z, Weinberger I, Davidson E, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme patterns in serum of patients with metastatic liver disease[J]. Clin Chem, 1989,35(5) :871-873.
  • 5Rotenberg Z, Weinberger I, Sagle A, et al. Total lactate dehydrogenase and its isoenzymes in serum of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer[ J ]. Clin Chem, 1998,34 (4) :668-670.
  • 6Pastor A, Menendex R, Cremades MJ,et a.1 Diagnostic value of sce CEA and CYFRA 21 .1 in lung cancer[J]. Abayseian analysis Eur Respir J, 1997, 10(3) : 603 - 609.
  • 7Niwa Y, Kisnimoto H, Shimokata K. Carcinomatous and tuberculors pleural effusions. Comparison of tumor markers[J].Chest, 1985,87(3): 351 - 355.
  • 8Light RW. Pleural effusion. N Engl J Med 2002,346(25):1971~1977.
  • 9Romero-Candeira S, Hernandez L, Romero-Brufao S et al. Is It Meaningful To Use BiochemicalParameters To Discriminate Between Transudative and Exudative Pleural Effusions? Chest.2002; 122:1524~ 1529.
  • 10Aoe K,Hiraki A,Murakami T,et al. Diagnostic significance of Interferon-γ in tuberculous pleural effusions. Chest 2003, 123:740~744.

共引文献130

同被引文献34

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部