期刊文献+

会计信息披露政府监管的经济后果——来自中国证券市场的经验证据 被引量:55

The Economic Consequence of Government Regulation on Accounting Information Disclosure: Empirical findings from Chinese Security Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文选取会计稳健性作为衡量会计信息质量指标,运用股票收益模型和盈余持续性模型来考察深沪证券交易所设立的诚信档案制度对上市公司会计信息质量的改善程度,籍此评价政府有关机构对我国证券市场会计监管措施的效果。研究结果表明:诚信档案制度对我国上市公司的会计信息质量提高具有一定的促进作用,但作用效果并不十分显著。这说明,我国政府部门对证券市场实施的一系列会计监管措施,在一定程度上能够发挥作用,从而达到缓解会计信息失真,完善市场机制的目的。 Using the stock return model and earnings persistence model,the article examines how the credit-file system established in Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange impacts the improvement of accounting information quality of listed companies,and evaluates effects of government regulation on security market,by selecting accounting conservatism as an indicator of accounting information quality.Our findings indicate that the credit-file system enhances the quality of accounting information to a certain extent,but the result is not as significant as expected.This illustrates that government regulations on securities market take effect to some extent which achieves the goal of reducing accounting frauds and enhancing the market mechanism.
作者 黎文靖
机构地区 暨南大学会计系
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第8期13-21,共9页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(项目批准号:70532003) 暨南大学人文社会科学发展基金项目(项目批准号:006jsyj040)的阶段性研究成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献41

  • 1杨纪琬.建立我国会计准则体系的原则[J].会计研究,1995(1):10-13. 被引量:10
  • 2Borokhovich, Panino and Trapani, Outside Directors and CEO Selection.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), pp. 337--355.
  • 3Hermalin, Weisbach, The Determinants of Board Composition. Rand Journal of Economics 19 (1988), pp. 589-606.
  • 4Hermalin, Weisbach, The Effects of Board Composition and Directors Incentives on Firm Performance. Financial Management, 20 (1992), pp. 101--112.
  • 5Jensen and Murphy, Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentive. Journad of Politicial Economy, 3 (1990), pp. 225--264.
  • 6Lipton, Lorsch, A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 48. no. 1, 1992, pp. 59--77.
  • 7Wu, Yili, Honey, I Shrunk the Board, Working Paper, 2000, University of Chicago.
  • 8Yermack, Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Jounud of Financial Economis, 40(1996), pp. 185--211.
  • 9尤金·法马,迈克尔·詹森(1983),《所有权与控制权的分离》,《所有权、控制权与激励——代理经济学文选》,陈郁编,上海人民出版社,1996年。
  • 10Chagantl, R.S., V. Mahajan and S. Sharma, 1985, Corporate Borad Size, Composition and Corporate Failures in Retalling Industry, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.22, P400-417.

共引文献1031

同被引文献608

二级引证文献625

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部