期刊文献+

梅鷟《尚书考异》考辨方法的检讨——兼谈考辨《古文尚书》的逻辑基点 被引量:11

An Examination of Mei Zhuo's Methodology in His Shang Shu Kao Yi:with a Discussion of the Logical Footing of the Critical Studies of Gu Wen Shang Shu
原文传递
导出
摘要 明朝中期,梅鷟著成系统考辨《古文尚书》的第一部专著《尚书考异》,逐一抉发晋以前文献中与《古文尚书》经文蹈袭雷同之处,但无法确证原创与抄袭。故考辨《古文尚书》的要点,并不在于发现多少蹈袭雷同的证据,而是需要为《古文尚书》辨伪确立一个有说服力的逻辑基点。有了这一逻辑基点,作伪举证方能显示其应有价值。《尚书考异》可能由梅鹗撰就,由梅鷟续成之。 In the mid-Ming Dynasty,Mei Zhuo's systematic research was summed up in his Shang Shu Kao Yi(A Critical Study of The Book of History).This became the first work ever devoted to systematic and critical study of the Gu Wen Shang Shu(The Book of History in the Ancient Script).Mei pointed out every point in pre-Jin Dynasty literature that was identical with that in the Gu Wen Shang Shu.However,he failed to find out which of different passages was the original text and which was plagiarized from elsewhere.Therefore,it is more important to establish a convincing logical footing for critical studies of Gu Wen Shang Shu than simply to list identical points.The identification of fabricated portions of the text is only valuable with such a logical footing.It is also possible that Shang Shu Kao Yi was originally written by Mei E,but finished by Mei Zhuo.
作者 姜广辉
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期95-118,共24页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1清代·朱彝尊《曝书亭集》卷58《尚书古文辨》. 文渊阁四库全书本,上海:上海古籍出版社,1987年,第1318册,第297页
  • 2明·胡广等撰.《书经大全·原序》,文渊阁四库全书本,第63册,第185页
  • 3黎靖德.《朱子语类》卷78,北京:中华书局,1986年,第1978页.
  • 4《书纂言·目录》,文渊阁四库全书本,第61册,第7页.
  • 5程廷祚.《晚书订疑·自序》,清·刘世珩校刊《聚学轩丛书》本.
  • 6清·嘉庆年间陈炳德等修.《旌德县志》卷9《艺文书目·经籍书目》,
  • 7本田成之.《中国经学史》,台北:广文书局,2001年,第254-255页.
  • 8《四库全书总目》卷12.北京:中华书局,1981年.第99页.
  • 9王充耘.《读书管见》卷下《后跋》,文渊阁四库全书本,第62册.第509页.
  • 10阎若璩.《尚书古文疏证》卷5下第七十四,文渊阁四库全书本,第66册.第274页.

共引文献20

同被引文献105

引证文献11

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部