期刊文献+

学习困难鉴定模型的新发展 被引量:9

The New Development of Identification Model of Learning Disabilities
原文传递
导出
摘要 能力-成绩差异模型是使用得最广泛的学习困难鉴定方法,但近年来,学者们从理论假设和实践应用上对该模型进行了猛烈的批评,并提出了新的鉴定模型:反应-干预模型。通过研究证明它比前者具有良好的信效度。尽管对反应-干预模型还存在争论,但其提倡的早期和综合性鉴别、诊断与干预治疗相结合等思想将指导今后学习困难的研究。 Ability-achievement discrepancy model is widely used to identify learning disabilities, but in recent years it has been severely criticized from both theory and practice. Many researchers propose an alternative model: response-intervention model. Researches indicate this model has better validity and reliability than the former. Although response-intervention model needs to be developed theoretically and practically, its advocation of combining early and integrated identification,diagnosis and interventions will enlighten future research.
作者 赵俊峰 许勇
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第9期49-53,共5页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
关键词 学习困难 能力-成绩差异模型 反应-干预模型 诊断 learning disabilities ability-achievement discrepancy model response-intervention model diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Kavale K. A, Forness S.R. What definitions of learning disabilities say and don't say: a critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2000, 33:239 - 256
  • 2Dombrowski S. C, Kamphaus R.W, Reynolds C R. After the demise of the discrepancy: proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology : Research and Practice, 2004, 35 (4) : 364 - 372
  • 3张小将,刘昌,刘迎杰.学习不良鉴定的能力-成绩差异模型[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(2):229-234. 被引量:14
  • 4Kavale K.A. Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disability, www. nrcld, org/html/information/articles/ldsummit/kavale.pdf, 2006 - 12 - 21
  • 5辛自强,俞国良.学习不良的界定与操作化定义[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(2):52-57. 被引量:73
  • 6Evans L.D. A conceptual overview of the regression discrepancy model for evaluating severe discrepancy between IQ and achievement score. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1990, 23 : 406 - 412
  • 7Siegel L.S. Why we do not need intelligence test score in the definition and analyses of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989, 22 : 514-518
  • 8Watkins M.W. Diagnostic validity of wechsler subtest scatter. Learning Disabilities: a Contemporary Journal, 2005, 3 (2): 8-27
  • 9Stanovich K. E, Siegel L.S. Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities:a regres- sion-based test of the phonological-core variable - difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1994, 86: 24- 53
  • 10Siegel L.S. IQ- discrepancy definitions and the diagnosis of LD: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2003, 6:2 - 3

二级参考文献33

  • 1刘全礼,闵学龙.近年来我国学习不良儿童研究综述[J].中国特殊教育,2001(4):16-21. 被引量:21
  • 2辛自强,俞国良.学习不良的界定与操作化定义[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(2):52-57. 被引量:73
  • 3张冬冬,王书荃.美国对学习困难的研究[J].心理科学进展,1996,6(1):57-62. 被引量:8
  • 4俞国良.学习不良儿童的评价[J].心理发展与教育,1995,11(1):48-52. 被引量:7
  • 5Eileen M A.Specific learning disability:current approaches to identification and proposals for change.Project Forum at National Association of State Directors of Special Education,Virginia,2003
  • 6Ackerman P,Peter J,Dykman P.Children with learning disabilities:WISC profiles.Journal of Learning Disabilities,1971,4:150~166
  • 7Kavale K A,Forness S R.A meta-analysis of the validity of Wechsler Scale profiles and recategorixations:Patterns or parodies? Learning Disability Quarterly,1984,7:136~156
  • 8Bateman D W.An educational view of a diagnostic approach to learning disabilities.In:J Hellmuth.Learning disorders.Seattle:Special Child Publication,1965.219~239
  • 9Mercer C D,Jordan L,Allsop D H et al.Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments.Journal of Learning Disabilities,1996,19:217~232
  • 10Cone T,Wilson L.Quantifying a sever discrepancy.A critical analysis.Learning Disability Quarterly,1981,4:359~372

共引文献108

同被引文献103

引证文献9

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部