期刊文献+

生态伦理与政策分析理论概观:进展与局限 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪60年代以来,西方发达国家对极限增长与绿色发展表现出了积极的关切。由此引发了公共政策研究的环境转向和理论建构,其中包括非人类生态存在的主体资格、成本收益的计量工具和基于价值优先性的比较方法等。尽管政策分析为实现生态伦理在政策层面的转换提供了有效的工具,但也在一定程度上简化了生态伦理的内在价值,具有一定的局限性和不确定性。
作者 张毅
出处 《天津社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期83-87,共5页 Tianjin Social Sciences
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1张茵,蔡运龙.条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(2):317-328. 被引量:128
  • 2Jr.Duncan MacRae and Dale Whittington,“Assessing Preferences in Cost-Benefit Analysis:Reflections on Rural Water Supply Evaluation in Haiti”,Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,1998(2).
  • 3阿玛蒂亚·森.《伦理学与经济学》,王宇等译,商务印务馆,2000年版,第23页.
  • 4Nicholas Kaldor,"Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility",The Economic Journal,Vol.49,No.195 (Sep.,1939).
  • 5J.R.Hicks,"The Foundations of Welfare Economics",The Economic Journal,Vol.49,No.196 (Dec.,1939).
  • 6John M.Gowdy,"The Revolution in Welfare Economics and Its Implications for Environmental Valuation and Policy",Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics,2003(12).
  • 7A.Randall,"Benefit-Cost Considerations should be Decisive when There is Nothing More Important at Stake",In Daniel Bromley and Jouni Paavola (eds.),Economics,Ethics,and Environmental Policy,Routledge,London,2002,pp.53-68.
  • 8Aldo Leopold,"The Land Ethic",A Sand Country Almanac,New York:Oxford University Press,1949,p.261.

二级参考文献39

  • 1杜亚平.改善东湖水质的经济分析[J].生态经济,1996,12(6):15-20. 被引量:19
  • 2Carson R T, Mitchell R C. The Value of Clean Water: the Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable, Fishable and Swimmable Quality Water. Water Resources Research, 1993, 29: 2445-2454.
  • 3Seip K, Strand J. Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: a Contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment. Environmental and Resource Economics 1992, 2(1): 91-106.
  • 4Navrud S. Willingness to Pay for Preservation of Species-an Experiment with Actual Payments. In: Navrud. Pricing the European Environment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.6-58.
  • 5Hanemann W M. Theory Versus Data in the Contingent Valuation Debate. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 38-60.
  • 6Kahneman D. Comments on the Contingent Valuation Method. In: Cummings R G, Brookshire D S, Schulze W D. Valuing Environmental Goods: a State of Arts Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Roweman and Allanheld, 1986. 185-194.
  • 7Baron J. Rationality and Invariance: Response to Schuman. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 145-166.
  • 8Fisher A C. The Conceptual Underpinnings of the Contingent Valuation Method. In: Bjornstad D J, Kahn J R. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources-Methodological Issues and Research Needs. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996. 19-37.
  • 9Carson R T. Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope. In: Kopp R J, Pommerhene W, Schwartz N. Determining the Value of Non-marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods. Boston: Kluwer, 1997. 127-163.
  • 10Shogren J F, Shin S Y, Hayes D J, et al. Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept. American Economic Review, 1994, 84: 255-269.

共引文献127

同被引文献10

  • 1刘湘溶.论生态伦理学的利益基础[J].道德与文明,2001(5):35-39. 被引量:10
  • 2包尔生.伦理学体系[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.20.
  • 3林水波,张世贤.公共政策[M].台北:台湾五南图书出版公司,1982:511.
  • 4http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2007-12/19/content_7277221.htm.
  • 5托马斯.公共决策中的公民参与[M].北京:中国人民大学,2005..
  • 6康德.道德形而上学原理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1986.87.
  • 7罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.61-62.
  • 8威廉·N·邓恩.公共政策分析导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
  • 9亚里士多德,廖申白译.尼各马克伦理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003..
  • 10陈振明.政策科学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:48.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部