期刊文献+

丙型肝炎病毒抗体诊断试剂盒的诊断性能评价 被引量:3

Performance characteristics of the EIAgen hepatitis C virus antibody kit assay
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过与 Ortho 3.0丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体诊断试剂盒比较,分析评价 EIAgenHCV 抗体诊断试剂盒(EIAgen)的诊断性能。方法应用考核试剂 EIAgen 和参比试剂 Ortho 3.0HCV 抗体诊断试剂盒对2881份样本进行检测,检测结果不一致时,应用重组免疫印迹试验(RIBA)确证试剂 RIBA HCV 3.0或核酸试验(NAT)确证试剂进行确证,以对结果进行综合分析。结果2881份样本中,考核试剂及参比试剂检测结果均为阳性,且参比试剂的测量值/临界值(S/CO)≥3.8,或检测结果符合确证试验阳性结果的阳性标本为274份,考核试剂及参比试剂检测结果均为阳性且参比试剂的S/CO<3.8为59份,阴性标本2539份,不确定的9份被剔除。考核试剂检测真阳性274份,无假阴性结果;真阴性2527份,假阳性12份。考核试剂敏感度为100%,高于参比试剂的98.91%;特异度为99.53%,略低于参比试剂的99.88%。考核试剂对部分国内常见 HCV 基因型(1a型、1b 型、2a 型、3型和6型)样本27份,均为真阳性,敏感度为100%,对于非 HCV 感染的病毒性肝炎、自身免疫性疾病及妊娠样本具有良好的特异度,特异度均为100%。溶血、脂血样本对考核试剂检测结果无影响。考核试剂阳性预测值为95.80%,阴性预测值为100%,准确性为99.57%。考核试剂S/C0≥5.9的样本301份,其中用参比试剂检测S/CO≥3.8占88.70%;考核试剂S/CO<5.9的29份,其中用参比试剂检测S/CO<3.8占86.21%。结论 EIAgen 敏感度100%,特异度较好,是一种优秀的检测抗-HCV EIAgen 试剂,尤其适用于阳性样本的筛选。采用 EIAgen 试剂检测样本,当S/CO≥5.9时,样本的阳性预测值较高。 Objective To compare the performance of EIAgen HCV kit (EIAgen HCV) versus the current Ortho HCV 3.0 Anti-HCV (Ortho 3. 0 HCV) assay in various clinical settings, such as blood banks and hepatology centers. Methods The two ELISA kits were evaluated simultaneously using a total of 2 881 specimens. All the results concordant positive for both assays and Ortho HCV result beyond 3.8 were classified as true positive (TP) or concordant negative for both assays as true negative (TN). The discordant specimens were further comfirmed using either RIBA 3.0 or a homebrew nucleic acid testing ( NAT ) assay. Results Among the 2 881 specimens evaluated, 274 specimens were TP, 2 539 specimens were TN, and 9 cases were indeterminate. The sensitivity of EIAgen HCV was 100%, versus 98.91% for Ortho HCV while their respective specificities were 99. 53% and 99. 88%. Positive predictive and negative predictive values of 95.80% and 100% were respectively obtained for EIAgen HCV assay. Overall, the accuracy was 99. 57%. Specimens under various conditions containing potentially interfering substances, such as acute non-C hepatitis, autoimmune diseases, pregnant women, hemolysis, and lipoidemia, showed no interferencewith the two ELISAs. EIAgen HCV S/CO ratio values more than 5.9 would be highly predictive for the TP status of these specimens. Conclusions Our findings indicate that EIAgen HCV Kit is more sensitive than Ortho HCV 3.0 Test in detecting antibodies to HCV. EIAgen HCV Kit appears to be an excellent tool, not only for use in diagnostic settings, but also ideally suited for the screening of blood and blood products.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第10期1143-1147,共5页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家"十.五"科技攻关计划资助项目(2001BA705806 2004BA718810) 国家重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(2005CB522902)
关键词 肝炎抗体 丙型 试剂盒 诊断 敏感性与特异性 Hepatitis C antibodies Reagent kits,diagnostic Sensitivity and specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Afdhal NH. The natural history of hepatitis C. Semin Liver Dis, 2004, 24(Suppl 2) :3-8.
  • 2王齐欣,魏来,高燕,陈志军,孙德贵,蒋栋,徐小元,陈红松,王宇.丙型肝炎病毒感染自然过程中准种的构成变化[J].中华医学杂志,2003,83(10):841-843. 被引量:10
  • 3Choo QL, Kuo G, Weiner AJ, et al. Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science, 1989,244:359-362.
  • 4Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health service inter-agency guidelines for screening donors of blood, plasma, organ, tissues, and semen for evidence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C. MMWR, 1991,40:1-17.
  • 5Allain JP. Hepatitis C virus in blood donation. Lancet, 2005 365:276-278.
  • 6Ownby HE, Korelitz JJ, Busch MP, et al. Loss of volunteer blood donors because of unconfirmed enzyme immunoassay screening results. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Transfusion, 1997,37 : 199-205.
  • 7Bar-Shany S, Green MS, Shinar E. False positive tests for antihepatitis C antibodies and the problem of notifying blood donors. Int J Epidemiol, 1996,25:674-678.
  • 8Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease. MMWR, 1998,47(RR-19) :1-39.
  • 9Tobler LH, Strainer SL, Lee SR, et al. Impact of HCV 3.0 ELISA relative to HCV 2.0 ELISA on blood-donor screening. Transfusion, 2003,43 : 1452-1459.
  • 10Kuramoto IK, Moriya T, Schoening V, et al. Fluctuation of serum HCV-RNA levels in untreated blood donors with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Virol Hepatitis, 2002,9:36-42.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Alter MJ, Kuhnert WL, Finelli L. Guidelines for laboratory testing and result reporting of antibody to hepatitis C virus. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2003, 52(RR-3): 1-13.
  • 2Colin C, Lanoir D, Touzet S, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of third-generation hepatitis C virus antibody detection assays: an analysis of the literature. J Viral Hepat, 2001, 8: 87-95.
  • 3Sakugawa H, Nakasone H, Nakayoshi T, et al. High proportion of false positive reactions among donors with anti-HCV antibodies in a low prevalence area. J Med Virol, 1995, 46: 334-338.
  • 4Bar-Shany S, Green MS, Shinar E. False positive tests for anti-hepatitis C antibodies and the problem of notifying blood donors. Int J Epidemiol, 1996, 25: 674-678.
  • 5Ownby HE, Korelitz JJ, Busch MP, et al. Loss of volunteer blood donors because of unconfirmed enzyme immunoassay screening results. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Transfusion, 1997, 37: 199-205.
  • 6Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease. MMWR, 1998, 47(RR-19): 1-33.
  • 7Giachetti C, Linnen JM, Kolk DP, et al. Highly sensitive multiplex assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and hepatitis C virus RNA. J Clin Microbiol, 2002, 40: 2408-2419.
  • 8赫飞 余宙耀.丙型肝炎基础与临床[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.61-87.
  • 9Farci P, Purcell RH. Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes and quasispecies. Semin Liver Dis, 2000, 20: 103-126.
  • 10Kiely P, Kay D, Parker S, et al. The significance of third-generation HCV RIBA-indeterminate, RNA-negative results in voluntary blood donors screened with sequential third-generation immunoassays. Transfusion, 2004, 44: 349-358.

共引文献46

同被引文献27

  • 1赵莉华,常缨,杨凤霞,孙晓红.国产乙肝酶免试剂盒的质量评价[J].河北医药,2006,28(5):394-394. 被引量:3
  • 2田拥军,覃莉,刘慎沛,雷延昌,赵西平,陆蒙吉,杨东亮.8种国产HBsAg试剂盒检测变异HBsAg的效果评价[J].临床检验杂志,2007,25(4):250-253. 被引量:40
  • 3中华人民共和国卫生部.医疗机构临床实验室管理办法[Z].2006.
  • 4U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare, medicaid and CLIA program: regulations implementing the clinical laboratory improvement amendment of 1988(CLIA) Final rule[J]. Fed Regist, 1992,57(40) :7002-7186.
  • 5Lavanchy D. Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus [ J ]. Clin Microbiol Infect,2011,17(2) :107 - 115.
  • 6Afdhal NH. The natural history of hepatitis C [ J ]. Semin Liver Dis,2004,24 ( Suppl 2 ) : 3 - 8.
  • 7Strader DB, Wright T, Thomas DL, et al. Diagnosis, manage- ment, and treatment of hepatitis C [ J ]. Hepatology, 2004,39 (4) :1147 - 1171.
  • 8Gretch DR. Diagnostic tests for hepatitis C [J]. Hepatology, 1997,26 ( 3 Suppl 1 ) :43 S - 47 S.
  • 9Choo QL, Kuo G, Weiner AJ, et al. Isolation of a eDNA clone derived from a blood-born non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome [ J ]. Science, 1989,244 (4902) :359 - 362.
  • 10Allain JP. Hepatitis C virus in blood donation[ J]. Lancet,2005, 365 (9456) :276 - 278.

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部