《中华儿科杂志》1996至2005年文献计量学分析

An analysis of articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics from 1996 to 2005

目的依据文献计量学原理,探讨《中华儿科杂志》载文作者、机构及地区分布情况,了解儿科学科研跨学科和地区情况、作者合作类型及特点。确定核心作者、核心机构和核心地区,并分析署名通信作者的意义。同时还探讨了科研资助项目论文发表的情况,以及论文中儿科学临床、儿科学基础两大类研究的比重。方法对《中文生物医学期刊文献数据库》CMCC(Chinese MedicalCurrent Content)收录该刊1996至2005年论文进行文献计量学分析。结果 10年刊出论文3337篇,合作论文2951篇(88.43%),合作度4.12。独著论文386篇(11.57%)。北京地区968篇(29%)。核心作者234人,发文1031篇(30.90%)。医学院校附属医院发文2095篇(62.78%)。科研院所发文261篇(7.82%)。高产机构10个,发文1273篇(38.15%)。该刊科研基金资助项目论文比例,从1996年的7.44%增长到2005年的25.82%,显示出科研基金资助项目对论文的推动作用。论文内容分类:儿科临床研究2243篇,占67.22%;基础研究,1094篇,占32.78%。结论该刊作者分布范围广,论文合作率较高,拥有一支实力雄厚,对刊物影响较大、造诣较深的核心作者群。各地区在儿科学领域研究中科研力量分布不均衡,高等院校的附属医院在国内儿科学研究领域中居前列。该刊的办刊思想清楚、正确,载文客观地反映我国儿科科研力量的分布和研究成果,同时还有重点和引导。

Objective To explore, on the basis of principles of bibliometrics, the distribution of the authors of the articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics, and the types of the institutions and the different regions from where the manuscripts were submitted in order to make a clear view of the characteristics and the status of cooperations in pediatric research work; to ascertain, among them, the core authors, core institutes and core regions; and to analyze the significance of corresponding authors, a new regulation adopted by this Journal in recent years, and to explore, furthermore, the funding status of the studies. Method Based on the information drawn from Chinese Medical Current Content （CMCC）, bibliometric method was used to analyze the publications in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics and their authorship during the period from 1996 to 2005. Result Totally 3337 academic articles were published during the ten years; of which the number of articles written by more than one authors was 2951, accounting for 88.43 %, with a degree of collaboration as 4. 12. The number of articles by a single author was 386 （ 11.57% ）. A total of 234 core authors contributed to 1031 research papers published （30. 90% of all）. As for the regions from where the papers were submitted, the top one was Beijing, which had 968 articles published （29% of all）. And for the institutes, the number of the papers from the hospitals affiliated to medical schools was 2095 （62. 78% of all ）, ranked the first. The second was research institutes which had 261 articles published in the Journal （7.82%）, and 68 articles were from colleges and universities which ranked the third （2. 03% ）. The top 10 institutes in number of papers had published 1273 articles （38.15% of all）. The articles, from research projects funded by certain grants published in this Journal increased almost every year, from 7. 44% of 1996 to 25.82% of 2005＇, which reflected timely and objectively a growing tendency in pediatric research and that funded research projects by certain garnts could be an important support to the publication of academic papers. The corresponding authorship as a signature regulation was introduced by this Journal in 1999, which played a positive role in pushing the leading work of key authors in construction of research groups. There were 2243 articles of pediatric clinical studies, （67. 22% ） and 1094 of basic research （32.78%）. Conclusion Chinese Journal of Pediatrics had a wide distribution of authors and a high cooperative rate. This Journal had a group of core authors who were strong in academy, active in research and productive in papers, and had a strong positive impact on this Journal. But it was also revealed that the research powers in the field of pediatric study were not evenly distributed. The guideline adopted by and for this Jounal was clear and correct. The articles published in this Journal not only objectively reflected the distribution of the research powers and the latest achievements in pediatric study over the country, but also had its focus, which played a certain leading role in pediatric research.