多元法律背景下的苏丹冲突法

The Conflict of Laws in Sudan under a Plural Legal Setting

苏丹是一个多元法律体制国家。在多元法律体制下,苏丹的冲突法与属人法交织在一起,只不过属人法在冲突法三个领域的地位和表现各不相同。在管辖权方面,苏丹的属人法管辖权规则对苏丹的冲突法管辖权规则没有产生影响,但在某些个别方面,冲突法的管辖权规则让位于属人法管辖权规则;在冲突法的第二阶段即法律适用过程中,属人法的影响非常明显,特别是在婚姻、离婚、继承等方面;在冲突法的最后一个阶段即外国判决的承认和执行中,主要涉及如何判断作出判决的外国法院对案件是否具有管辖权,苏丹法院基本上是根据冲突法而不是属人法的概念作出分析。

Sudan is a country with a legal plural setting under which the conflict of laws and personal laws interact with each other, however, personal laws play different roles in the three areas of conflict of laws. The personal jurisdictional rules have no influence on the conflict jurisdictional rules, but in some aspect, the conflict jurisdictional rules make conceasion to the personal counterparts in jurisdiction. The influence of personal law is manifest in the choice of law process, especially in marriage, divorce, succession, etc. In the last process of conflict of laws, that is the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, the Sudan courts based their analysis on concepts of conflict of laws instead of personal laws as to thequestion whether the foreign courts has competence to hear the case.