期刊文献+

Hyperspectral Estimation of Corn Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation 被引量:4

Hyperspectral Estimation of Corn Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) is one of the important variables in many vegetation productivity and biomass estimation models. Therefore, it is significant to retrieve FPAR accurately for the improvement of model precision. On the basis of the field experiment, this article analyzed the correlations between corn canopy FPAR and spectral reflectance, and reflectance derivative. Discussion about the mechanism of FPAR estimation with different empirical models is based upon corn canopy reflectance, reflectance derivative, NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) and RVI (ratio vegetation index). The reflectance of visible bands showed much better correlations with FPAR than near-infrared bands. The correlation between FPAR and reflectance derivative varied more frequently and greatly than that between FPAR and reflectance, and with preferable correlation only around 520, 570, 670, 805, 950, and 1 010 nm. Reflectance and reflectance derivative both had intimate correlation with FPAR at some typical single band, with the maximum R^2 of 0.791 and 0.882, respectively. In a word, reflectance derivative and vegetation index were much effective in the estimation of corn FPAR than reflectance, and the stepwise regression of multibands with reflectance derivative showed the best regression with R^2 of 0.944. Reflectance at 375 and 950 nm with absorption characteristics caused by water showed prodigious potential for FPAR precisely estimating model establishment. On the whole, vegetation index and reflectance derivative had good relationships with FPAR, and could be used for FAPR estimation. It would be effective for choosing right bands and excavating the hyperspectral data to improve FPAR estimating precision. Fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) is one of the important variables in many vegetation productivity and biomass estimation models. Therefore, it is significant to retrieve FPAR accurately for the improvement of model precision. On the basis of the field experiment, this article analyzed the correlations between corn canopy FPAR and spectral reflectance, and reflectance derivative. Discussion about the mechanism of FPAR estimation with different empirical models is based upon corn canopy reflectance, reflectance derivative, NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) and RVI (ratio vegetation index). The reflectance of visible bands showed much better correlations with FPAR than near-infrared bands. The correlation between FPAR and reflectance derivative varied more frequently and greatly than that between FPAR and reflectance, and with preferable correlation only around 520, 570, 670, 805, 950, and 1 010 nm. Reflectance and reflectance derivative both had intimate correlation with FPAR at some typical single band, with the maximum R^2 of 0.791 and 0.882, respectively. In a word, reflectance derivative and vegetation index were much effective in the estimation of corn FPAR than reflectance, and the stepwise regression of multibands with reflectance derivative showed the best regression with R^2 of 0.944. Reflectance at 375 and 950 nm with absorption characteristics caused by water showed prodigious potential for FPAR precisely estimating model establishment. On the whole, vegetation index and reflectance derivative had good relationships with FPAR, and could be used for FAPR estimation. It would be effective for choosing right bands and excavating the hyperspectral data to improve FPAR estimating precision.
出处 《Agricultural Sciences in China》 CAS CSCD 2007年第10期1173-1181,共9页 中国农业科学(英文版)
基金 Many thanks are given to the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX-SW-356) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40401003), and the Project of Field Station on Resources and Environment of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
关键词 CORN FPAR reflectance DERIVATIVE NDVI RVI corn, FPAR, reflectance, derivative, NDVI, RVI
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1高彦华,陈良富,柳钦火,顾行发,田国良.叶绿素吸收的光合有效辐射比率的遥感估算模型研究[J].遥感学报,2006,10(5):798-803. 被引量:25
  • 2Huemmrich K F,Privette J L,Mukelabai M,Myneni RB,Knyazikhin Y.Time-series validation of MODIS landbiophysical products in a Kalahari woodland, Africa[].International Journal of Remote Sensing.2005
  • 3Mei A X,Peng W L,Qin Q M,Liu H P.An Introduction toRemote Sensing[]..2001
  • 4Myneni R B,Knyazikhin Y,Privette J L,Running S W,Nemani,Zhang Y,Tian Y,Wang Y,Morisette J T,Glassy J,Votava P,Lotsch A.MODIS leaf area index (LAI) and fractionof photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by vegetation(FPAR) product (MOD15)[].Algorithm Theoretical BasisDocument Version.1999
  • 5Pu R L,Gong P.Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and ItsApplications[]..2000
  • 6Cramer W,Kicklighter D W,Bondeau A,Moore I B,ChurkinaG,Nemry B,Ruimy A,Schloss A L.Comparing globalmodels of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP):overview and key results[].Global Change Biology.1999
  • 7Daniel C S,Scott J G,Edward J H.Validation of MODISFPAR products in boreal forests of Alaska[].IEEETransactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.2006
  • 8Fensholt R,Sandholt I,Rasmussen M S.Evaluation ofMODIS LAI, fAPAR and the relation between fAPAR andNDVI in a semi-arid environment using in situ measurements[].Remote Sensing of Environment.2004
  • 9Friedl M A,Davis F W,Michaelsen J,Moritz M A.Scaling and uncertainty in the relationship between the NDVIand land surface biophysical variables: An analysis using ascene simulation model and data from FIFE[].Remote Sensingof Environment.1995
  • 10Goward S N,Huemmrich K F.Vegetation canopy PARabsorptance and the normalized difference vegetation index:An assessment using the SAIL model[].Remote Sensing ofEnvironment.1992

二级参考文献14

  • 1Monteith J L. Solar Radiation and Productivity in Tropical Ecosystems[J]. J Appl. Ecol. 1972, 9:747-766.
  • 2Monteith J L. Climate and the Efficiency of Crop Production in Britain[J]. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. B. 1977, 281:277-294.
  • 3Prince S D, Goward S N. Global Priomary Production : a Remote Sensing Approach [ J]. Journal of Biogeography, 1995, 22:815-835.
  • 4Potter C S, Banderson J T, Field C B, et al. Terrestrial Ecosystem Production:A Process Model based on Globe Satellite and Surface Data[J].Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993,7 :811-841.
  • 5Xiao X, Zhang Q, Braswell B, et al. Modeling Gross Primary Production of Temperate Deciduous Broadleaf Forest Using Satellite Images and Climate Data [J].Remote Sensing Environment, 2004, 91 : 256-270.
  • 6Gobron N, Pinty B, Aussedat O, et al. Evaluation of FAPARP roducts for Different Canopy Radiation Transfer Regimes:Methodology and Results Using JRC Products Derived from SeaWiFS Against Ground-based Estimations'[ J ]. Journal of Geophysical Research, in print, 2006.
  • 7Knyazikhin Y, Glassy J, Privette J L, et al. MODIS Leaf Area Index(LAI) and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation Absorbed by Vegetation ( FPAR ) Product ( MOD15 ) [ J ].Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document Version 4.0, http://modls, gsfc. nasa. gov/data/athd/athd_mod15.pdf. 1999.
  • 8Ruimy A, Saugier B, Dedieu G. Methodology for the Estimation of Terrestrial Net Primary Production from Remotely Sensed Data[ J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 99 : 5263-5283.
  • 9Field C B, Randerson J T, Malmstrom C M. Global Net Primary Production : Combining Ecology and Remote Sensing[J].Remote Sensing of Environment, 1995, 51( 1 ) : 75-88.
  • 10Running S W, Nemani R R, Heinsch F A, et al. A Continental Satellite-derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production[J]. Bioscience, 2004, 54(6) : 547-560.

共引文献24

同被引文献91

引证文献4

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部