摘要
长期以来,"民族主义"文艺和"战国策派"文艺在中国现当代文学史上是相提并论的,被斥之为具有"法西斯主义"倾向的流派。研究证明,它们是两个性质迥异的流派。通过对其成员组成、文艺观、时代观以及理论渊源几个方面的辨析表明,"民族主义"文艺派是为国民党政治统制"代言";"战国策派"文艺则为中国民族文学在世界文学殿堂中赢得一席之地而"立言",同时还是实现该派"战时文化反思和重建"主旨的一支重要力量,自觉承担着五四以来改造国民性的重要任务。
In Chinese modem and contemporary literary history both nationalism literature and art and ZhanGuoCe School's literature and art are denounced as schools with "fascism" tendencies. Research proves that the two schools are completely different in nature. A detailed analysis of the different members, different literary views, different views of times and different origins shows that the nationalism literature and art is the mouthpiece for the political rule of Kuomitang, while ZhanGuoCe School' s is the expounder for the national Chinese literature to establish itself in the world literary field. In the meantime, ZhanGuoCe School is the main force of realizing its goal of "cultural reflection and reconstruction at wartime" and it voluntarily shoulders the important task of reforming the people since the May Fourth Movement.
出处
《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2007年第5期90-97,共8页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
浙江理工大学"战国策派"文化思想与文学形态研究(0415213-Y)成果之一
关键词
代言
立言
民族主义
“民族主义”文艺
“战国策派”文艺
mouthpiece
expounder
nationalism
nationalism literature and art
ZhanGuoCe School's literature and art