期刊文献+

异丙酚靶控输注时成人与小儿BIS的比较 被引量:5

Difference in BIS level between adults and children during target-controlled infusion of propofol
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨脑电双频谱指数(BIS)监测小儿麻醉深度的准确性,比较异丙酚靶控输注(TCI)麻醉中小儿与成人BIS的差异。方法择期手术病人68例,分为年幼组(A组,3~5岁,n= 20)、年长组(B组,6~12岁,n=20)和成年组(C组,18~55岁,n=28),采用异丙酚TCI,初始血浆靶浓度3μg/ml,每30秒增加0.3μg/ml,意识消失(LOC)、意识恢复(ROC)时记录异丙酚的血浆靶浓度(Cp)、效应室浓度(Ce)及BIS。Ce=Cp达到2、3、4、5、6μg/ml时记录BIS。结果3组病人的BIS随着异丙酚Cp的增加而明显下降(P〈0.01);A组和B组BIS与Cp的相关性高于C组(P〈0.01);在相同的Cp和Ce下A组和B组的BIS均明显高于C组,A组高于B组(P〈0.01);A组、B组和C组BIS≤40时的异丙酚Ce分别平均为6、5、3μg/ml;A组LOC和ROC时的BIS明显高于C组(P〈0.01);C组LOC时的异丙酚Ce明显低于A组(P〈0.01)。结论在相同的异丙酚Cp和Ce下,小儿与成人BIS差别较大,年龄越小,BIS越高;在意识消失和意识恢复时,年幼小儿的BIS明显高于成人。 Objective To investigate the difference in the relationship of bispectral index (BIS) to depth of anesthesia between adults and children. Methods Sixty-eight ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients undergoing elective surgery were divided into 3 age groups: group A young children 3- 〈 6 yr, n = 20) ; group B older children (6-12 yr, n = 20) and group C adults ( n = 28). The patients were premedicated with intramuscular pethidine 1 mg/kg and promethazine 1 mg/kg (in children) or 25 mg (in adults), and anesthetized with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol. The initial target plasma concentration of propofol (Cp) was set at 3μ/ml and increased by 0.3 μ/ml every 30 seconds until the patients lost BIS values at LOC and recovery of (LOC). The Cp and target effect-site concentration (Ce) and (ROC) were recorded. BIS values were also recorded when Cp = Ce = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6μ/ml. Results The BIS values were significantly decreased as Cp was increasing ( P 〈 0.01). The correlation between BIS values and Cp was significantly better in children (group A and B) than in adults (group C). At the same Cp and Ce BIS values were highest in group A and lowest in group C (group A 〉 group B 〉 group C). When BIS values≤40, Ce = 6μ/ml in group A, 5μ/ml in group B and 3μ/ml in group C on average. At LOC and ROC BIS values in group A were significantly higher than those in group C, but there was no significant difference in BIS values between group B and C. At LOC and ROC there was no significant difference in Cp among the 3 groups. At LOC Ce in group C was significantly lower than that in group A ( P 〈 0.01) .Conclusion At the same Cp and Ce there is significant difference in BIS values between children and adults, the younger the age, the higher the BIS value. The BIS values are higher in young children than in adults.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第9期780-782,共3页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 二异丙酚 药物释放系统 脑电描记术 Propofol Drug delivery systems Electroencephalography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Dennan W, Rosow D, Ezhicki K, et al. Correlation of bispectral index (BIS) with end-tidal sevoflurance concentrations in infants and children. Anesth Analg, 2000, 90: 872-877.
  • 2李广明,李军,曾因明.异丙酚靶控输注在小儿麻醉中应用的进展[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2004,25(1):48-50. 被引量:31
  • 3Short TG, Aun CS, Tan P, et al. A prospective evaluation of pharmacokinetic model controlled infusion of propofol in paediatrie patients. Br J Anaesth, 1994,72:302-306.
  • 4Kataria BK, Ved SA, Nicodemus HF, et al. The pharmacokinetics of propoful in children using three data analysis approaches. Anesthesiology, 1994,80 : 104-122.
  • 5Schuttler J, Ihmsen H. Population pharmacokinetics of propofol: a muhicenter study. Anesthesiology, 2000, 92: 727-738.
  • 6Weber F, Fussel U, Gruber M, et al. The use of remifentanil for intubation in paediatrie patients during sevoflurane anaesthesia guided by Bispectral Index(BIS) monitoring. Anaesthesia, 2003, 58:749-755.
  • 7Guignard B, Menigaux C, Duppont X, et al. The effect of remifentanil on the bispectal index change and hemodynamic response after oretracheal intubation. Anesth Analg, 2000,90;161-162.
  • 8张永谦,岳云,冯春生,曲向东.单纯靶控输注雷米芬太尼对BIS和AEPI的影响[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2006,27(1):29-32. 被引量:27
  • 9Ross AK, Davis PJ, Dear Gd GI, et al. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil in anesthetized pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery or diagnostic procedures. Anesth Analg, 2001,93:1370-1372.

二级参考文献28

  • 1李海林,詹振刚.小儿麻醉应用异丙酚全麻加硬膜外阻滞70例报告[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1995,15(10):475-476. 被引量:6
  • 2Klemola U M, Hiller A. Tracheal intubation after induction of anesthesia in children with propofol-remifentanil or propofol-rocuronium. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia,2000,47:8.54-859.
  • 3Guignard B, Menigaux C, Dupont X, et al. The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg, 2000,90:161-167.
  • 4Gray C, Swinhoe C F, Myint Y, et al. target controlled infusion of ketamine as analgesia for TIVA with propofol. Can J Anesth, 1999,46:957-961.
  • 5Lehmann A, Boldt J, Rompert Rk, et al. Target-controlled infusion or manually controlled infusion of propofol in high-risk patients with severely reduced left ventricular function. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth, 2001 15: 445-450.
  • 6Cajraj R J, Dio M, Mantzaridis H, et al. comparision of bispectral EEG analysis and auditory evoked potentials for monitoring depth of during propofol. Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth,1999,82:672-678.
  • 7Kang T M. Propofol infusion syndrome in critically ill patients. Ann Pharmacother, 2002,36.1453-1456.
  • 8安刚,主编.婴幼儿麻醉学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002,218-219.
  • 9Kataria B K, Ved S A, Nicodemus H F, et al. The Pharmocolinetics of Propofol in Children using Three Different Analysis Approaches. Anesthsiology, 80:104-122.
  • 10Schuttler J, Ihmsen H. Population Pharmacokinetics of propofol. Anesthesiology, 2000, 92: 727-738.

共引文献56

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部