摘要
目的观察比较两种手术方式(小梁切除术+虹膜根切术;脉络膜上腔引流术)治疗难治性青光眼的临床远期疗效。方法回顾性分析2002年2月至2006年1月我院收治的难治性青光眼共87例(91只眼),应用脉络膜上腔引流术治疗37例(37只眼),应用小梁切除+虹膜根切术治疗50例(54只眼)。手术成功的判定标准:不用或仅局部应用抗青光眼药物,眼压控制在5~21 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)之间,且视力稳定、角膜透明者视为手术成功。结果随访时间均在1年以上,平均随访(34.3±13.7)个月。末次随访经脉络膜上腔引流术治疗组成功30只眼(81.1%);经小梁切除+虹膜根切术治疗组成功32只眼(59.3%)。两组手术成功率差异有显著性(X^2=4.815,P<0.05)。应用脉络膜上腔引流术治疗组手术成功率高。结论长期随访观察及临床研究显示脉络膜上腔引流术较小梁切除+虹膜根切术设计合理,手术成功率高,并发症少,远期疗效好。
Objective To evaluate the long-erm effectiveness of aqueous fluid internal drainage operation from epichoroidal spaces and trabeculectomy add iridectomy on refractory glaucoma. Methods 87cases(91eyes) diagnosised refractory glaucoma between 2002 and 2006 were studied. 37cases ( 37eyes ) were treated with epichoroidal spaces drainage , 50cases ( 54eyes) were treated with trabeculectomy add iridectomy. Definitions of successful operation were determined as ( 1 ) intraocular pressure (IOP) were controlled between 5mmHg and 21mmHg with vision improved or no descented and clear corneal. ( 2 ) no anti-glaucoma medication or only local medication of topical anti-laucoma drops. Results All cases were followed-up for over 1year, the mean followed-p time was ( 37.3 ± 13.7 ) months. According the last follow-p, 30 eyes ( 81.1% ) were successful in the epichoroidal spaces drainage group; 32 eyes ( 59.3% ) were successful in the trabeculectomy add iridectomy group. Statistical significant difference ( χ^2=4. 815 , P 〈 0.05 ) was found in the success rate between these 2 groups. Conclusion Long-erm observations have confirmed that epichoroidal spaces drainage had a higher success rate and fewer complications than trabeculectomy add iridectomy during the follow-up time.
出处
《临床眼科杂志》
2007年第5期391-393,共3页
Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
基金
云南省自然科学基金(2006C0077M)
云南省教育厅基金(06Y08SC)
关键词
脉络膜上腔
小梁切除
难治性青光眼
远期疗效
Epichoroidal space
Trabeculectomy
Refractory glaucoma
Long-term effect