期刊文献+

交互理论指导下的组间小组活动模式研究

An Empirical Study of a Cross-group,Interactive-compensatory Classroom Activity in International Theory Context
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对目前大学英语课堂小组活动中普遍存在的一些问题,如教师无法对小组活动进行监控、活动主题与教学内容脱节等,研究并尝试了一种组间小组活动模式。该模式中,课堂讨论主要以问答形式在组与组之间轮流进行,讨论话题围绕所学教材。在探究运用交互理论研究这种教学模式下,学生用目的语进行交流的语言特点。研究结果表明,在这种组间小组讨论模式中,所有学生都能获得用目的语进行表达的机会;交际中也出现了意义协商,但意义协商的数量较少,多由句法、词汇障碍引起,学生也表现出了对自己语言进行修正的愿望。他们在交流中还运用了许多该课中出现的生词,对课文也获得了更深的了解,并能尝试提出自己的见解。这对扩大学生的知识面、提高他们的交际能力有较大的促进作用。 The purpose of this paper is to examine how students interact in the target language in a new small group teaching framework proposed by the author. In the proposed teaching frmnework, students are brought together for face-to-face discussions about their texts in group pairs in front of the whole class. Results indicate that in this teaching framework, all members of the class received some opportunities to use the target language to participate in the interactive activities, and instances of negotiation of meaning believed to be beneficial to second language acquisition also occurred. The majority of these negotiations were triggered by syntactic and lexical confusions. But students only generated 34 negotiations. Many students were reluctant to indicate non-comprehension even if they encountered communication breakdowns. However, this does not necessarily mean that students did not feel "pushed" to make their language comprehensible. This could be demonstrated by students' frequent self-correction of their own language and the fact that of the 34 negotiations, only 2 moves did not receive any verbal response. Another observed feature of students' interactions is that students used many new words of the unit to convey their messages. They also got much better understanding of the text and began to learn to advance their own ideas. This will improve their world knowledge as well as their English oral proficiency. This could help to explain students' positive and favorable response to this teaching framework.
出处 《河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第3期35-40,共6页 Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 小组活动 教学模式 组间小组活动 语言产出 意义协商 small group work teaching framework cross-group language production negotiation of meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Long,Michael.,Leslie Adams.,Marilyn McLean,& Fernando Castaiios.Doing things with words:verbal interaction in lockstep and small group classroom situations[C].In On TESOL'1976,Ruth Crymes & John Fanselow (Eds.),137-153.
  • 2[2]Swain,M.Three functions of output in second language learning[C].In Principles and Practice in the study of language.G.Cook & B.Seidlehofer (Eds.) Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995.
  • 3[3]Long,M.Input,interaction,and second language acquisition[C].In Native language and foreign language acquisition:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,(Ed.) H.Winitz,1981:379,259-278.
  • 4[4]Krashen,S.D.,& Terrell,T.D.The natural approach language acquisition in the classroom[M].Jew Jersey:Alemany Press,1987.
  • 5[5]Long,M.Input,interaction,and second language acquisition[C].In Native language and foreign language acquisition:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,(Ed.).H.Winitz,1981:379,259-278.
  • 6[6]Doughty,C.,& Pica,T.Information Gap tasks:Do they facilitate second language acquisition[J].TESOL Quarterly,1986(20):305-325.
  • 7[7]Chaudron,C.Comprehension,comprehensibility and learning in the second language classroom[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition,1985(7):216-32.
  • 8[8]Varonis,E.,& Gass,S.Non-native/non-native conversations:A model for negotiation of meaning[J].Applied Linguistics,1985(6):71-90.
  • 9庞继贤,吴薇薇.英语课堂小组活动实证研究[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(6):424-430. 被引量:348

二级参考文献1

共引文献347

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部