期刊文献+

人格测验的变异性及效应量分析

An analysis of variances of personality testing and effect sizes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨重复测量中不同人格分量表得分的特点及其变化规律。方法323名某部官兵在相隔42 d两次参加了中国士兵人格问卷(CSPQ)测验。结果相关结果表明在6个分量表中,除防御性分量表外,测验分数的变异性与相应的人格分数都有显著的相关(r=0.11-0.37)。效应量统计结果表明,求异性、敏感特质、分离特质分量表分数的变异性随分数的增加而增加。除防御性分量表外,高分组与中等组之间差别有实际意义(Cohen d〉0.20)。结论人格测验分数的变异性不是完全随机的,是具有一定稳定性或规律性的。 Objective To find out the characteristics of variance of personality tests in repeated testing. Methods 323 soldiers attended the CSPQ twice for an interruption of 42 days. Results The correlation analysis found out that variances of all but one subtests (Defense) are significantly correlated with respective standardized scores (0.11 - 0.37, P 〈 0.05 ). Analysis of effect size showed that the variances of the subtests of Difference Seeking, Sensitive, Dissociate increased with the growth of respective standardized scores. And the differences between high-score group and middle-score group of all but one subtests (Defense) have real effects ( Cohen d 〉 0.20). Conclusion The variances of personality scores are not completely random.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2007年第10期922-923,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词 人格测验 变异性 效应量 Personality test Variance Effect size
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Funder D. The Personality Puzzle. New York: Norton, 1997.1-2.
  • 2Mitra SK, Fiske DW. Intra-individual variability as related to test score and item. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956,16:3-12.
  • 3Goldberg LR. The reliability of reliability : the generality and correlates of intra-individual consistency in responses to structured personality inventories. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978,2 : 269-291.
  • 4MacDonald SW, Hultsch DF, Bunce D. Intraindividual variability in vigilance performance: does degrading visual stimuli mimic age-related “neural noise” ? J Clin Exp Neuropsychology,2006,38 : 655-675.
  • 5Austin EJ, Deary IJ, Gibson GJ, et al . Individual response spread in self-report scales : Personality correlations and consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998,24 : 421-438.
  • 6Fiske DW. An intensive study of variability scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1957,17:453-465.
  • 7Mitra SK,Fiske DW. Intra-individual variability as related to test score and item. Educational and Psvchological Measurement. 1956.16: 3-12.
  • 8陈强,李红政,肖玮,王家同,苗丹民.中国士兵人格问卷-Ⅱ的信度研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(3):276-278. 被引量:7
  • 9Olejnik S, Algina J. Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations. Contemp Educ Psychol, 2000,25:241-286.
  • 10Pere J. Ferrando Person Reliability in Personality Measurement: An Item Response Theory Analysis. Applied Psychologyical Measurement, 2004,28 : 126-140.

二级参考文献68

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部