期刊文献+

后现代主义高等教育观点述评 被引量:1

Review on the Postmodernistic Opinions on Higher Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪八九十年代以来,鉴于高等教育在知识社会中重要性的增强,部分欧美的后现代主义者零散表达了有关高等教育的一些观点。本文在后现代主义的背景下,阐述了后现代主义高等教育的思想渊源,即后现代主义者对后福特制和自由主义的分析,概括了后现代主义高等教育观点的主要内容,并加以分析。 Considering the fact that higher education is becoming more and more important in knowledge society, some postmodernists have been expressing their opinions on higher education in bits and pieces since 80s, 90s in 20th century. Under the background of postmodernism, the article expatiates on the ideological origins of the postmodernistic opinions on higher education, that is, the analysis of Post-Fordism and liberalism given by postmodernists. Then the main content of the postmodernistic opinions on higher education is summed up and a brief comment is shown.
出处 《南京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第5期57-61,共5页 Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
基金 第38批"中国博士后科学基金"(中博基字[2005]19号) "江苏省博士后科研资助计划"(苏人通[2005]249号)资助项目成果之一
关键词 后现代主义 高等教育 后福特制 自由主义 postmodernism higher education Post-Fordism liberalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Richard Taylor,Jean Barr,Tom Steele.For a Radical Higher Education-After Postmodernism[M].Buckingham:The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press,2002.
  • 2蔡拓.后现代主义评析[J].理论与现代化,1999(8):28-30. 被引量:4
  • 3[4]Peter Scott.The Meanings of Mass Higher Education[M].Buckingham:The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press,1995.
  • 4[5]Peter Scott.The postmodern university?[A].Anthony Smith,Frank Webster.The Postmodern University? Contested Visions of Higher Education in Society[C].Buckingham:The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.1997:54.
  • 5[6]Robin Usher,Erchards Edwards.Postmodernism and Education[M].London:Routledge,1994.
  • 6[7]Bill Readings.The University in Ruins[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1996.
  • 7[8]Ronald Barnett.Realizing the University in an Age of Supercomplexity[M].Buckingham:The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press,2000.
  • 8[9]Michael Peters,Simon Marginson.Introduction,Access:Critical Perspectives on Cultural and Policy Studies in Education[J].1999,18(2):ii.

共引文献3

同被引文献5

  • 1刘复兴.后现代教育思维的特征与启示[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,46(4):11-13. 被引量:61
  • 2张华 石伟平 马庆发.课程流派研究[M].济南:山东教育出版社,2000..
  • 3RortyR. The Dangers of Over Philosophication Replyto Arcilla and Nicholson[J].Educafiona/ 77ieory,1990,40(l) :41.
  • 4江怡.走向斬世纪的西方哲学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:524.
  • 5皮连生.智育心理学[M]北京:人民教育出版社,1997:40-41.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部