期刊文献+

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the quantitative expression of P-gp, LRP, MRP, GST-π in NSCLC and its clinical significance 被引量:2

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the quantitative expression of P-gp, LRP, MRP, GST-π in NSCLC and its clinical significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background and objective Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plays an important role in systemic chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). P-glycoprotein (P-gp), lung resistance related protein (LRP), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) and glutathione S-transferase (GST-π) may be associated to drug resisitance to chemotherapy in NSCLC. The aim of this study is to investigate the expressions of P-gp, LRP, MRP and GST-π in samples from NSCLC patients before and after treatment with NACT, and their quantitative changes, so that to evaluate the influence of NACT on drug resistance to chemotherapy of NSCLC. Methods Total 92 specimens from 72 cases of NSCLC, including 52 samples of surgery excision from non-NACT-treated patients and 20 paired samples before and after NACT from the same patient, were studied. The expression of P-gp, LRP, MRP and GST-π was detected with tissue chip technique and immunohistochemistry. The quantitative analysis was carried out by computer image analysis system. Results In the samples before NACT, the positive rate of P-gp, LRP, MRP, GST-π expression was 66.67% (48/72), 72.22% (52/72), 81.94% (59/72), 83.33% (60/72), respectively. The expressive intensity of P-gp, LRP and GST-π was significantly stronger in adenocarcinoma than that in squamous cell carcinoma (P<0.05, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively); there was no significant difference in the expression of MRP between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (P>0.05). In samples after treatment with NACT, the expression of P-gp, GST-π demonstrated by average optical density (AOD) and integral optical density (IOD) were significantly higher (P<0.05, P<0.001 respectively) than that in biopsied samples taken before NACT; The change in expression of P-gp, GST-π was also showed difference by different histopathological types, differentiations, ages, sizes, clinical stages as well as lymph node metastasis or not (P<0.05 or P<0.001). There was no significant difference between samples taken before and after NACT (P>0.05) in the expression of LRP and MRP demonstrated by both of AOD and IOD. Conclusion The results suggest that drug resistance in adenocarcinoma is primarily stronger than that in squamous cell carcinoma. NACT may enhance acquired drug resistance of NSCLC through inducing the expression of drug resistance protein. The results indicate that acquired drug resistance must be considered with the application of NACT to NSCLC patient in clinic, especially to patient in stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ. Since NACT may lead to the enhancement of acquired drug resistance in stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ, this may dwindle the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy after surgery. Comparative examination of drug resistance proteins before and after NACT, combining with comprehensive consideration of chemical regimens of NACT, should be recommended during chemotherapy of NSCLC for both before and after surgery. Background and objective Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plays an important role in systemic chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). P-glycoprotein (P-gp), lung resistance related protein (LRP), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) and glutathione S-transferase (GST-π) may he associated to drug resisitanee to chemotherapy in NSCLC. The aim of this study is to investigate the expressions of P-gp, LRP, MRP and GST-π in samples from NSCLC patients before and after treatment with NACT, and their quantitative changes, so that to evaluate the influence of NACT on drug resistance to chemotherapy of NSCLC. Methods Total 92 specimens from 72 cases of NSCLC, including 52 samples of surgery excision from non-NACT-treated patients and 20 paired samples before and after NACT from the same patient, were studied. The expression of P-gp, LRP, MRP and GST-π was detected with tissue chip technique and im- munohistochemistry. The quantitative analysis was carried out by computer image analysis system. Results In the samples before NACT, the positive rate of P-gp, LRP, MRP, GST-π expression was 66.67% (48/72), 72.22% (52/72), 81.94% (59/72), 83.33% (60/72), respectively. The expressive intensity of P-gp, LRP and GST-π was significantly stronger in adenocarcinoma than that in squamous cell carcinoma (P〈0.05, P〈0. 001, P〈0. 001, respectively); there was no significant difference in the expression of MRP between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (P〉0.05). In samples after treatment with NACT, the expression of P-gp, GST-π demonstrated by average optical density (AOD) and integral optical density (IOD) were significantly higher (P〈0.05, P〈0. 001 respectively) than that in hiopsied samples taken before NACT; The change in expression of P-gp, GST-π was also showed difference by different histopathological types, differentiations, ages, sizes, clinical stages as well as lymph node metastasis or not (P〈0.05 or P〈0. 001). There was no significant difference between samples taken before and after NACT (P〉0. 05) in the expression of LRP and MRP demonstrated by both of AOD and IOD. Conclusion The results suggest that drug resistance in adenocarcinoma is primarily stronger than that in squamous cell carcinoma. NACT may enhance acquired drug resistance of NSCLC through inducing the expression of drug resistance protein. The results indicate that acquired drug resistance must he considered with the application of NACT to NSCLC patient in clinic, especial- ly to patient in stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ. Since NACT may lead to the enhancement of acquired drug resistance in stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ , this may dwindle the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy after surgery. Comparative examination of drug resistance proteins before and after NACT, combining with comprehensive consideration of chemical regimens of NACT, should he recommended during chemotherapy of NSCLC for both before and after surgery.
出处 《中国肺癌杂志》 CAS 2007年第5期398-405,共8页 Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
关键词 临床意义 非小细胞肺癌 组织芯片 数量性状位点 化学药物治疗 Drug resistance protein Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Non-small cell lung cancer Tissue chip Quantitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA CancerJ Clin,2005,55(2):74-108.
  • 2支修益,张毅,许庆生,刘宝东,苏雷,王若天,胡牧,王辉荣.Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌患者术前新辅助化疗效果分析[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(1):60-60. 被引量:23
  • 3Depierre A, Milleron B, Moro-Sibilot D, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with primary surgery in resectable stage Ⅰ (except TIN0),Ⅱ, and Ⅲa non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol,2002,20(1):247-253.
  • 4Depierre A, Milleron B, Moro-Sibilot D, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with primary surgery in resectable stage Ⅰ (except TIN0),Ⅱ, and Ⅲa non-small-cell lung cancer.J Clin Oncol,2002,20(10):2603-2604;author reply 2605.
  • 5郝军,王妍,李庆昌,王恩华,邱雪杉,刘云鹏.MRP在非小细胞肺癌和正常肺组织中表达及其预后意义的研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2005,8(1):32-36. 被引量:13
  • 6唐晓平,毛伯镛,余定庸,冯凌,唐文国,罗仁国,苟章洋,漆建.髓母细胞瘤CyclinD_1、P16的表达及其与临床病理特点和预后的关系[J].中华神经外科杂志,2004,20(5):377-380. 被引量:6
  • 7Rigas JR, Lara PN Jr. Current perspectives on treatment strategies for locally advanced, unresectable stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer,2005,50S2 :S17-S24.
  • 8Pohl G, Krajnik G, Malayeri R, et al. Induction chemotherapy with the TIP regimen (paclitaxel/ifosfamide/cisplatin) in stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer,2006,54(1) :63-67.
  • 9Muraoka M, Oka T, Akamine S, et al, Postoperative complications of pulmonary resection after platinum-based induction chemotherapy for primary lung cancer. Surg Today,2003,33(1):1-6.
  • 10Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Winokur TS, et al. Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg,2004,78 (6): 1903-1909.

二级参考文献46

  • 1Novoa N,Varela G,Jimenez MF.Morbidity after surgery for non-small cell lung carcinoma is not related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2001,20:700-704.
  • 2Jocelyne M,Robert JG,Amir A,et al.Morbidity and mortality after neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer:the risks of right pneumonectomy.Ann Thorac Surg,2001,72:1149-1154.
  • 3Christophe D,Pascal T,Xavier T,et al.Postoperative complications in relation with induction therapy for lung cancer.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2001,20:385-390.
  • 4Luca V,Luca L,Claudia G,et al.Results of induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection in patients with stage ⅢA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer:the importance of the nodal down-staging after chemotherapy.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2001,20:1106-1112.
  • 5[12]Loe DW, Deeley RG, Cole SPC, et al. Biology of the multidrug resistance-associated protein [J]. Eur J Cancer,1996,32A(6):945-957.
  • 6[13]Campling BG, Young LC, Baer KA, et al. Expression of the MRP and MDR1 multidrug resistance genes in small-cell lung cancer [J]. Clin Cancer Res,1997,3(1):115-122.
  • 7[14]Narasaki F, Matsuo I, Ikuno N, et al. Multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) gene expression in human lung cancer [J]. Anticancer Res,1996,16(4A):2079-2082.
  • 8[15]Wright SR, Boag AH, Valdimarsson G, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of multidrug resistance protein in human lung cancer and normal lung [J]. Clin Cancer Res,1998,4(9): 2279-2289.
  • 9[16]Oshika Y, Nakamura M, Tokunaga T, et al. Multidrug resistance-associated protein and mutant p53 protein expression in non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. Mod Pathol,1998,11(11):1059-1063.
  • 10[17]Scheper RJ, Broxterman HJ, Scheffer GL, et al. Overexpression of a Mr 110 000 vesicular protein in non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance [J]. Cancer Res,1993,53(7):1475-1479.

共引文献50

同被引文献3

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部