期刊文献+

腔内剜除法在前列腺汽化电切术中的应用

Intraluminal enucleation in transurethral vaporization and electro-resection of the prostate
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨在汽化电切术中应用剜除法治疗前列腺增生的临床治疗效果。方法回顾性分析62例前列腺增生患者在汽化电切术中应用腔内剜除法治疗的临床资料。结果62例患者均顺利完成手术。其中单极汽化电切12例,等离子体双极汽化电切50例。手术时间50~162min,平均76min。术中出血40~200ml,平均110ml。无输血病例。切除前列腺组织62~138g,术后留置导尿管3~5d,住院7~10d,平均8 d,全组病例均治愈出院。随访1~20个月,平均8个月。术后IPSS症状评分平均减少22分,最大尿流率增加至(16.8±3.3)ml/s。未出现尿道狭窄、永久性尿失禁、电切综合征、继发出血、逆行射精和复发等并发症。结论腔内剜除法是内镜治疗前列腺增生的一种全新切割方法,安全、高效,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of intraluminal enucleation in transurethral vaporization and electro-reesection of the prostate. Methods A retrospective analysis was reviewed in 62 case of prostatic hypertrophy,which were treated with intraluminal enucleation in vaporization of prostate. All pacients had a sucessful operation. There were 12 case in unipolar vaporization and 50 in plasmakenitic bipolar vaporization. Results Operation time ranged from 50 to 162 minutes,with an average of 76min. Bleeding ranged from 40 to 200 ml,with an average of ll0ml. There was no blood transfusion. The weight of prostate was 62-138g,the catheter was maintained for 3-5 days postoperatively. The hospital stay was 7-10 days, average 8 days. All patients were cured. There was a fllow-up for 1- 20 months,with an average of 8 months. The IPSS decreased by 22 points on average, and peak urine flow(Qmax) increasd to ( 16.8 ± 3.3 ) ml/s. There wre no urethralstricture, permanent urinary incontinence, TURS,postoperative hemorrhage, retrograde ejaculation and recurrence. Conclusions Intraluminal enucleation in treatment of prostalic hypertroply is a new,safe,and effective method, which should be popularized in clinical practice.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2007年第9期1433-1434,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 前列腺增生 经尿道前列腺汽化电切术 并发症 出血 Prostatic hypertrophy Transurethral valp-resection of the prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Zwergel U, Wullich B, Lindenmeir U, et al. Long-term results following transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urel, 1998,33:476-480.
  • 2Ekengern J, Hahn RG. Complications during transurcthral vaporization of the prostate. Urology, 1996,48:424-426.
  • 3Kaplan SA, Te AE. Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate : A novel method for treating men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 1995,45:566-569.
  • 4Saad F, Carrier S, Joliver-Tremblay M. Comparison of prostatic electrovaporization and transurethral resection in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Ann Chir, 1997,51:884-886.
  • 5Tuhkanen K, Heino A, Ala-Opas M. Contact laser prostatectomy compared to TURP in prostatic hypcrplasia smaller than 40ml. Six-month follow-up with complex urodynamic assessment. Scand J Urel Ncphrel, 1999,33:31-34.
  • 6杨培谦 张玉海.经尿道前列腺汽化电切术,前列腺外科[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.236-242.
  • 7张良,叶敏,陈建华,孔良,王伟明,马邦一.经尿道前列腺电汽化与经尿道前列腺电切对BPH的疗效比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1998,19(5):300-302. 被引量:134
  • 8甘为民,万恒麟,石涛,王子明.经尿道前列腺电切和气化术治疗前列腺增生症412例报告[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2000,15(4):147-149. 被引量:78
  • 9陈明,周志耀,陈承志,郑世广,鲁德生,吴幸辰,徐宪章,孙则禹,顾晓箭.经尿道接触式激光、电极汽化及电汽化切割治疗前列腺增生的效果比较(附758例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2000,21(7):429-432. 被引量:33

共引文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部