期刊文献+

313例脊髓损伤患者FIM评定结果分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the Functional Independence Measure of 313 Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同损伤平面、不同损伤程度的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者日常生活活动(ADL)状况的特点。方法对313例SCI住院患者进行功能独立性评定(FIM)评分,根据损伤平面和损伤程度的不同,将FIM评定的得分情况进行统计学分析。结果颈、胸、腰髓损伤患者的得分差异有显著性意义(P〈0.05-0.01);随损伤平面的降低,FIM评分升高;同一损伤平面不同损伤程度的SCI患者的FIM评分差异有显著性意义(P〈0.05-0.01),但腰髓完全性和不完全性SCI患者的FIM评分差异无显著性意义(P〉0.05)。结论FIM评分可客观反映不同损伤平面、不同损伤程度SCI患者的ADL状况。 Objective To study the effect of lesion level and completeness on activities of daily living (ADL) of patients with spinal cord injury (SCD. Methods The functional status of 313 SCI patients were assessed using the Functional Independence Measurement (FIM), and FIM scores were calculated for statistical analysis with different lesion levels and completeness. Results FIM scores pres- ented significant differences among cervical-level group, thoracic-level group and lumbar-level group ( P 〈0.05 - 0.01). Patient with a high lesion level had lower FIM score. In the same lesion level group, FIM scores presented significant differences between the incomplete SCI patients and the complete ones ( P 〈0.05- 0.01). However, the lumbar lesion patients had no significant differences in FIM score between the complete group and the incomplete group ( P 〈0.05). Conclusion FIM can objectively reflect the ADL level in SCI patients with different lesion level and completeness.
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 2007年第10期917-918,共2页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 脊髓损伤 损伤平面 损伤程度 功能独立性评定 spinal cord injury (SCI) lesion level lesion completeness Functional Independence Measurement (FIM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1王方永,李建军,洪毅.用ASIA2000标准评估脊髓损伤神经功能恢复的初步研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2006,12(7):568-570. 被引量:13
  • 2恽晓平.康复疗法评定学[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003:6.
  • 3Grill E, Stucki G, Scheuringer M, et al. Validation of International Classification of Functioning, Disability,and Health (ICF) core sets for early postaeute rehabilitation facilities: comparisons with three functional measures[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 85 (8): 640-649.

二级参考文献18

  • 1王方永,李建军,洪毅.应用ASIA标准等评价脊髓锐器伤早期康复疗效[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(2):103-104. 被引量:5
  • 2王方永,李建军.脊髓损伤神经功能评价标准发展历程及相关研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(10):820-822. 被引量:5
  • 3王方永,李建军,洪毅.中国人ASIA2000标准运动评分效度初步研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(11):932-933. 被引量:5
  • 4McKinley W,Meade MA,Kirshblum S,et al.Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2004,85(11):1818-1825.
  • 5Kirshblum S,Millis S,McKinley W,et al.Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2004,85(11):1811-1817.
  • 6Priebe MM,Waring WP.The interobserver reliability of the revised American Spinal Injury Association standards for neurological classification of spinal injury patients[J].Am J Phys Med Rehabil,1991,70(5):268-270.
  • 7Kirshblum SC,Memmo P,Kim N,et al.Comparison of the revised 2000 American Spinal Injury Association classification standards with the 1996 guidelines[J].Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2002,81(7):502-505.
  • 8American Spinal Injury Association,International Medical Society of Paraplegia.International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury,Revised 2000[S].Chicago:American Spinal Injury Association,2000.
  • 9Capaul M,Zollinger H,Satz N,et al.Analyses of 94 consecutive spinal cord injury patients using ASIA definition and modified Frankel score classification[J].Paraplegia,1994,32(9):583-587.
  • 10Waters RL,Adkins RH,Yakura JS.Definition of complete spinal cord injury[J].Paraplegia,1991,29(9):573-581.

共引文献15

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部