摘要
本文从《伤寒论》六经的生理、病理等方面论述了六经辨证的模糊性,认为这种模糊性是《素问·热论》的二值逻辑向多值逻辑思维方式的发展,模糊和精确是互相依存、互相联系的矛盾对立关系,模糊性是绝对的、普遍的,而精确性则是相对的,是模糊性的特例和体现。思维的所谓“活性”问题,归根到底是模糊识别、模糊分析和模糊综合评判等思维机制问题。对这种思维方法的进一步研究,将有助于对六经实质的探索,并使《伤寒论》辩证论治精神更加发扬光大。
The paper discusses the fuzzy theory in Shanghanlun(Treatise on Exogenous Febrile Diseases)from the physiological and pathological point of view of six meridians. The author believes that this fuzzy theory is evolved from two-component logic of Plain Questions to polycomponent logic, and that fuzziness and accuracy are interdependent and interrelated; fuzziness is universal but absolute, while accuracy is relative and is the special case and reflexion of fuzziness. The so-called 'activity' of tbinking, in the final analysis, is the mechanism of thoughts including fuzzy discrimination, fuzzy analysis and fuzzy judgement. It is also believed that a further study on this method of thinking will contribute to the study of the essence of six meridians and to the development of zheng differentiation theory recorded in Shanghanlun.
关键词
六经辨证
模糊理论
SIX MERIDIANS ZHENG DIFFERENTIATION/Methods PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL