期刊文献+

考虑多年冻土蠕变特性的抗拔桩非线性有限元分析 被引量:7

NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF UPLIFT PILE WITH CONSIDERATION OF CREEP CHARACTERISTIC IN PERMAFROST
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合青藏铁路多年冻土区钻孔灌注抗拔桩现场载荷试验,依据场地多年冻土地温实测资料、物理力学参数以及冻土类型,考虑多年冻土蠕变特性,对冻土区钻孔灌注抗拔桩进行非线性有限元分析。桩–土体系有限元分析采用三维十节点四面体等参单元,桩–土相互作用采用面–面接触单元;同时,假定桩–土体系本构模型服从Drucker-Prager屈服准则。通过数值模拟计算结果与抗拔桩现场载荷试验的对比分析,结果表明,考虑冻土蠕变的分析结果与试验值较为接近,不考虑冻土蠕变时,当外载荷较大时桩顶上拔位移的计算值要比试验值小43%左右,但外载荷较小时两种计算结果差别不大。因此,考虑冻土蠕变的分析方法更比较符合多年冻土区钻孔灌注抗拔桩的实际受荷特点。 Combined with the field loading test of large diameter uplift pile casted in-situ in permafrost region of Qinghai-Tibet Railway,based on actually measured ground temperature in permafrost region,physico-mechanical parameters and frozen soil type,nonlinear finite element analysis is conducted to analyze uplift pile casted in-situ in permafrost region considering creep characteristic.Three-dimensional 10-node tetrahedral structural element is adopted in pile-soil system.Surface-to-surface contact element is used in pile-soil interaction,and the constitutive model of pile-soil system is assumed to obey Drucker-Prager yield criterion.Through the comparison of numerical results and test ones,it is shown that the analytic result and test result of creep deformation agree well with each other.If not considering frozen soil creep in calculation,the difference is not too much when external load is small;and the calculation value of displacement at the top of pile uplift is about 43% smaller than the test result when external load is large.So the method in which frozen soil creep is considered can truly reflect the actual characteristic of uplift pile in permafrost region.
出处 《岩石力学与工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第A01期3101-3106,共6页 Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering
基金 铁道部科技司资助项目(2001G001–B–09)
关键词 数值分析 冻土蠕变 多年冻土 抗拔桩 numerical analysis creep of frozen soil permafrost uplift pile
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1兰州交通大学土木工程学院.青藏铁路冻土抗拔桩试验成果报告[R].兰州:兰州交通大学土木工程学院,2005.
  • 2中华人民共和国铁道部.青藏铁路高原多年冻土区工程勘察暂行规定[S].北京:中华人民共和国铁道部,2003:1-144.
  • 3铁道第一勘察设计院.青藏铁路格拉段初步设计文件,第二篇:地质[R].兰州:铁道第一勘察设计院,2001.
  • 4王旭,蒋代军,赵新宇,史昌盛,王长虹.青藏高原多年冻土区不同地温分区下大直径钻孔灌注桩回冻规律试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(24):4206-4211. 被引量:15
  • 5崔托维奇HA 张长庆 朱元林 译.冻土力学[M].北京:科学出版社,1985.160-170.
  • 6COYLE H M, REESE L C. Load transfer for axially loaded piles in clay[M]. [S. l. ]: [s. n. ], 1996.
  • 7JUVINALL R C, MARSHEK K M. Fundamentals of machine component design[M]. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1991.
  • 8GOODMAN R E, TAYLOR S L. A model for the mechanics of jointed rock[J]. J. Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 1968,94(3): 637 - 660.
  • 9DUNCAN J, CHANG C Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strainin soils[J], J. Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 1970, 96(5): 1 629- 1 653.
  • 10CLOUGH G W, HANSEN L A. Clay anisotreopy and braced wall behavior[J]. J. Geotech. Engneering Div., 1981, 107(7): 893 - 914.

二级参考文献1

  • 1Rowley R K, Watson G H, Ladand B. Vertical and lateral pile load tests in permafrost[A]. In: Permafrost Second International Conference[C]. New York: North American Contribution, 1976

共引文献57

同被引文献76

引证文献7

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部