期刊文献+

初中二年级学习困难学生的中央执行功能 被引量:13

Central Executive Function in Adolescents with Learning Disabilities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探测初中二年级学习困难生的中央执行功能。方法:采用学习困难量表筛选出初中二年级语文困难26人、数学困难29人、双困难29人和控制组学生28人,通过纸笔和计算机个别测试,所有学生均完成3项中央执行功能任务。结果:三项中央执行功能任务的反应时均存在显著的组间差异,控制组明显小于学习困难组,不同学习困难类型学生的中央执行功能的缺陷程度不同。其中数字划消反应时任务中,语文困难组(34.2±8.0)、数学困难组(36.4±4.7)、双困难组(42.1±8.6)均高于控制组(30.4±4.0)(分别为F=9.68、12.7、14.6,P(0.01或0.001);数字与字母连线反应时任务中,语文困难组(64.1±8.0)、数学困难组(73.5±20.7)、双困难组(86.7±25.3)亦均高于控制组(分别为45.5±8.2、45.5±8.2、45.5±8.2)(F=14.7、19.8、21.8,P(0.01或0.001)。结论:不同类型学习困难生的中央执行功能均存在不同程度的缺陷,数学困难和双困难组的缺陷程度高于语文困难组。 Objective: To explore the central executive function of adolescents with learning disabilities. Methods: Using learning disabilities screening method, we selected candidates from three different secondary schools, including 26 students with Chinese learning disabilities, 29 with mathematics learning disabilities, 26 weak in both fields and 28 as the normal control. All children completed the language and spatial working memory capacity duties through written records and individual computer test. Results: Children with learning disability had longer reaction time than control. Children with different type of learning disabilities had different flaw in executive function. Children with Chinese disabilities had higher score than the control group in figures zoned response tasks ( 34. 2 ± 8.0/30.4 ± 4. 0, F = 9. 68, P 〈 0. 01 ( , those with mathematical disabilities had also higher score than the control ( 36.4 ± 4. 7/30. 4 ± 4. 0, F= 12. 7, P 〈 0. 001 ( . Children with both difficulties had even higher score (42. 1 ±8. 6/30.4 ±4. 0, F= 14. 6, P 〈 0. 001). Similar things happened in the reaction time of digits and letters alliance, i.e. , those with Chinese disabilities ( 64. 1 ± 8. 0 ) , with mathematical disabilities ( 73. 5 ± 20. 7 ) , and with both difficulties ( 86. 7 ± 25.3 ) all had higher score than control (45.5 ± 8.2, F = 14. 7, 19. 8, 21.8, P 〈 0. 01 or 0. 001 ) . Conclusion : Different types of learning disabilities have different degrees of central executive function defects ; those with mathematical problem or with both problems are poorer than those with Chinese disability alone.
作者 王恩国 刘昌
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第10期661-665,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(30200082) 高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文专项资金(200006)
关键词 中央执行功能 工作记忆 学习困难 病例对照研究 central executive function working memory learning disabilities case-control study
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Baddeley AD.Working memory.Science,1992,255:556-559.
  • 2Baddeley AD,Emslis H,Kolodny J,et al.Random generation and the executive of working memory.Q J Exp Psychol,1998,51A:819-852.
  • 3Anderson JR,Reder LM,Lebiere C.Working memory:Activation limits on retrieval.Cogn Psychol,1996,30:221-256.
  • 4Daneman M,Carpenter PA.Individual differences in working memory and reading.J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav,1980,19:45-466.
  • 5Larigauderie P,Gaonac D,Lacroix N.Working memory and error detection in texts:what are the roles of the central executive and the phonological loop?Appl Cogn Psychol,1998,12:505-527.
  • 6Montgomery JW.Understanding the language differences of children with specific language impairment:does verbal working memory matter?Am J Speech Lang Pathol,2002,11 (1):77-92.
  • 7Just MA,Carpenter PA.Acapacity theory of comprehension:Individual differences in working memory.Psychol Rev,1992,99:12-149.
  • 8Logic RH,Gihooly KJ,WynnV.Counting on working memory in problem solving.Mem Cogn,1994,22:395-410.
  • 9Rammelaere S,Stuyven E.The contribution of working memory resources in the verification of simple mental srithmetic sums.Psychol Res,1999,62:72-77.
  • 10Jonides J,Lacey SC,Nee DE.Process of working memory in mind and brain.Curr Direct Psychol Sci,2005,14(1):2-5.

二级参考文献32

  • 1刘凡.数字记忆广度对策略应用模式的影响──中美儿童计算能力差异的比较研究[J].心理科学,1994,17(1):21-27. 被引量:13
  • 2[21]Chuah Y M L, Maybery M T. Verbal and spatial short - term memory: common sources of developmental change[ J] ? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1999, 73, 7 -44.
  • 3[1]Kail R. Developmental changes in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence[ J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, 109,490 - 501.
  • 4[2]Kail R. Speed of information processing: Developmental change and links to intelligence [ J ]. Journal of School Psychology, 2000, 38, 51 -61
  • 5[3]Salthouse TA. The processing - speed theory of adult age differences in cognition[ J ]. Psychological Review, 1996, 103: 403 - 428.
  • 6[4]Swanson H L. What develops in working memory? A life span perspective[J]. Developmental Psychology, 1999, 35,986- 1000.
  • 7[5]Baddeley A. Working memory[J]. Science, 1992, 255,556 -559.
  • 8[6]Engle R W. Working memory capacity as executive attention [ J ]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002, 11, 19 - 23.
  • 9[7]Engle R W, Tuholski S W, Laughlin J E, et al. Working memory, short - term memory and general fluid intelligence: a latent variable approach [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1999, 128, 309 - 331.
  • 10[10]Fry A F, Hale S. Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence for a developmental cascade [J]. Psychological science, 1996, (7), 237-241.

共引文献67

同被引文献214

引证文献13

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部