期刊文献+

溶质截留法和液-液排除法表征陶瓷超滤膜的比较 被引量:1

Comparison on solute transport and liquid-liquid displacement porosimetry for characterization of ceramic ultrafiltration membranes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用溶质截留法和液-液排除法对两根TiO2和ZrO2无机陶瓷超滤膜进行表征.溶质截留法所测得TiO2和ZrO2膜的平均孔径(μp)和几何标准偏差(σp)分别为30.8 nm,25.4 nm和1.82,1.58.液-液排除法测得TiO2和ZrO2膜的平均孔径分别为71.2 nm,54 nm,大约是溶质截留法的2.2倍.两种测定方法的结果均显示,TiO2膜的平均孔径大于ZrO2膜,而且TiO2膜的孔径分布较宽,但从最可几孔径来看,两种膜比较接近.对同一根膜而言两种表征方法测得的孔径分布的基本形状相似.实验结果表明两种方法都能较好的反映膜的孔径分布,将二者结合起来对超滤膜的表征有很好的借鉴意义. Two kinds of inorganic ceramic ultrafiltration membranes TiO2 and ZrO2 were characterized by solute transport and liquid-liquid displacement porosimetry (LLDP). The mean pore sizes (μp) and geometric standard deviations of the membranes mentioned above (ap) calculated by solute transport method are 30.8 nm, 25.4 nm and 1.82,1.58, respectively. Mean pore sizes of the two membranes measured by LLDP are 71.2nm, 54 nm, respectively, and are about 2.2 times larger than that calculated from the solute transport. The results from both methods showed that two membranes had close most probable pore size, but TiO2 membrane had a larger mean pore size and a wider pore size distribution than that of ZrO2 membrane. The shapes of the pore size distribution curves obtained from the two methods are similar for the same membrane. All the results indicated that both methods could reflect the pore size distribution of membranes and that the combination of the two methods was recommendable for the characterization of ultrafiltraton membranes.
出处 《膜科学与技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期65-68,73,共5页 Membrane Science and Technology
基金 国家基础研究计划(No.2003CB615707) 国家自然科学基金(No.20436030)
关键词 溶质截留法 液-液排除法 孔径分布 陶瓷超滤膜 solute transport liquid- liquid displacement porosimetry pore size distribution ceramic ultrafiltration membranes
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Michaels A S. Analysis and prediction of sieving curves for ultrafiltration membranes: A universal correlation[ J ]. Sep Sci Technol, 1980,15.1350 - 1322.
  • 2Singh, Khulbe K C, Matsuura T,et al. Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy[J]. J Membr Sci, 1998, 142:111-127.
  • 3Kassotis J, Shmidt J, Hodgins L T, et al. Modeling of the pore size distribution of ultrafiltration membranes [J ]. J Membr Sci, 1985, 22:61 - 76.
  • 4Gumi T, Valiente M, Khulbe K C, et al. Characterization of activated composite membranes by solute transport, contact angle measurement, AFM and ESR [J]. J Membr Sci, 2003, 212:123-134.
  • 5Khayet M, Matsuura T. Determination of surface and bulk pore sizes of flat- sheet and hollow-fiber membranes by atomic force microscopy, gas permeation and solute transport method[J]. Desalination, 2003, 158:57- 64.
  • 6Calvo J I, Bottino A, Capannelli G, et al. Comparison of liquid-liquid displacement porosimetry and scanning electron microscopy image analysis to characterize ultrafiltration track - etched membranes [ J ]. J Membr Sci, 2004, 239:189 - 197.
  • 7曾坚贤,邢卫红,徐南平.多通道陶瓷超滤膜孔径分布及截留率测定[J].水处理技术,2001,27(5):249-254. 被引量:6
  • 8诸爱士,林贤诉,高兴.液-液置换法测试超滤膜孔径及其分布的研究[J].浙江科技学院学报,2004,16(4):239-243. 被引量:5

二级参考文献9

共引文献9

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部