期刊文献+

改良的可靠主义 被引量:5

The Reformist Reliabilism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 可靠主义是当代知识论中的一个重要范畴,经过数十年的发展,仍是当前讨论知识与确证的最主要对象和运用的最基本概念之一。自其出现、发展至今,可靠主义已经发生了转变。当前的可靠主义理论已经偏离了传统的外在主义途径,转而向内在主义与外在主义的调和,甚至完全偏向内在主义。我们没有否认可靠主义转向的正确性和重要意义,因为知识的获得,必然要综合内在因素和外在因素。如果把戈德曼以及阿姆斯特朗等人早期对可靠主义的论述看作传统阶段,或传统意义上的可靠主义,那么后来对可靠主义进行修正与发展则可视作改良的可靠主义。本文结合戈德曼新确证理论、格雷科的主体可靠主义、斯杜普的内在主义可靠论,探讨有别于传统的改良的可靠主义,并认为可靠主义尽管经历了变化,但"可靠性"、"过程"的内涵则一直在延续,所变的也只是这个过程中的主体和对象,表现为"德性"或"特性"等。 Reliabilism works as one significant category in the contemporary Theory of Knowledge (Epistemology) for tens of years, while it is still one of the most principal objects and most essential concepts used in the current discussion of knowledge and justification. It has been changing since its starting point, and can be easily seen that the present reliabilism has departed from the traditional Externalism, diverting to the integration of Internalism and Externalism or even leaning to an obvious Internalism. We never deny the validity and significance of this diversion or turn, since the acquisition of know;edge has to invoke to the combination of both internal and external factors. If early treatments of relia bilism by A. I. Goldman and D. Armstrong could be counted as the traditional phase or the tradit;onal reliabllism, the later amendments or developments may be considered the reformed reliabilism, such as the justification theory advanced by Go;dman in 1980s and 90s, J. Grecds agent reliabilism, M. Steup's internalist reliabilism. This paper inquires the reformed reliabilism differing from the traditionalist, and holds that the implication of the reliability and process has been preserved and what has been transformed refers to the subject and object during the process, represented as virtues or properties, despite there is much change occurr'ng to reilabilism.
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第10期5-11,共7页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部哲学社会科学重大基金项目(05JJD720.4002) 江苏省青蓝工程项目基金(苏教师2005-12) 江苏省"333"高层次人才培养工程项目基金(苏人才2007-6)
关键词 可靠主义 改良 确证理论 知识理论 reliabilism reform justification theory the theory of knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Michael Williams. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology[M]. Oxford University Press, 2001:32-37.
  • 2Erik J Olsson. The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:31.
  • 3Keith Lehrer. Theory of Knowledge[M]. 2^nd edition, Boulder,CO; Westview Press, 2000:169.
  • 4A I Goldman. A Causal Theory of Knowing[J].The Journal of Philosophy, 1967(64) : 357-372.
  • 5社会知识论:从利华到戈德曼[D].香港中文大学,2004:103-114.
  • 6D M Armstrong. Belief, Truth and Knowledge[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1973 : 157-170.
  • 7Peter J Markle. Goldman's New Reliabilism[J].Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1996, 56(4) :799-817.
  • 8A I Goidmaa. Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences[M]. The MIT Press, 1992.
  • 9Ernest Sosa. Proper Functionalism and Virtue Epistemology[J].Nous,1993(27):1.
  • 10Roderick Chlsholm. The Indispensabiiity of Internal Justiflcation[J]. Sythese, 1988(74) : 285 - 296.

二级参考文献17

  • 1康德.《纯粹理性批判》[M].商务印书馆,1997年.第527、533、534页.
  • 2丹西.《当代认识论导论》[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990年.第30-38页.
  • 3康德 邓晓芒译.《纯粹理性批判》[M].人民出版社,2004年.第471页.
  • 4罗蒂 李幼蒸译.《哲学和自然之镜》[M].三联书店,1987年.第283页.
  • 5.《知识论》[M].商务印书馆,1996年.第771-775页.
  • 6波普.《科学发现的逻辑》.查汝强,邱仁宗译.沈阳出版社,1999.
  • 7[5,8]齐硕姆,邹惟远等译:《知识论》,三联书店1988年版,第163、163-164、166-167页.
  • 8See James Pryor, There is Immediate Justification, in Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, ed. byM. Steup and Ernest Sosa. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. , 2005, p. 198.
  • 9See Jonathan Dancy and Ernest Sosa,A Companion to Epistemology. Basil Blackwell Ltd. 1992, p. 159.
  • 10石里克.《普通认识论》,李步楼,译.商务印书馆,2005年,第104页.

共引文献19

同被引文献41

  • 1陈英涛.论戈德曼确证的信赖主义[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(7):10-13. 被引量:7
  • 2丛杭青,戚陈炯.集体意向性:个体主义与整体主义之争[J].哲学研究,2007(6):49-56. 被引量:13
  • 3Michael Williams, Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology, Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 32 - 37.
  • 4Erik J. Olsson, The Epistemology of Keiththrer, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, p. 31.
  • 5Keith Lehrer, Theory of Knowledge ,2^nd edition, Boulder Co. Westview Press, 2000, p. 169.
  • 6Robert Audi, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, ( 2nd Edition), Cambridge University Press, 2001, p. 792 ; p. 276.
  • 7D. M. Armstrong, Belief, Truth and Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, 1973, pp. 159 - 161 ;p. 157;pp. 162 - 163;p. 166; pp. 166- 167;pp. 168 - 169.
  • 8苏珊·哈克.《证据与探究》(中译本序言),陈波、张力锋译,中国人民大学出版社,2004,第3页.
  • 9A. I. Goldman, "A Causal Theory of Knowing", The Journal of Philosophy, No. 64 ( 1967 ), pp. 357 - 372.
  • 10高基存.《社会知识论:从利华到戈德曼》,香港中文大学博士论文.2004年8月,第103-114页.

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部