期刊文献+

基于线性扩张的群决策方法 被引量:1

Approach to group decision-making based on linear extensions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对决策者给出方案集在每个属性下的偏序偏好,且决策者没有确定权重的多属性群决策问题提出了一种新的集结排列方法。该方法首先利用偏序的线性扩张求出方案集在各个属性下的排列概率,进而定义一偏好关系的概念,得到每对方案间的偏好度,然后采用OWA算子对决策群体进行集结,集结后的群体偏好具有偏序特征,能更真实地体现现实的决策问题,并且最大程度地反映了决策群体的偏好。最后给出了算例。 A new aggregating method was presented for ranking alternatives based on partial order preference of groups about each criterion, and decision maker without determining weights. The ranking probability between alternatives for each criterion is worked out by using the linear extensions of the partial order, and then the preference degree between alternatives is obtained through defining the preference relation. Based on OWA operators, the preference information provided by every decision maker is aggregated into group preference and the group preference with partial order characteristic, the participants' preference is reflected by the result at most. Finally, a numerical example is used to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《西安科技大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第3期531-535,共5页 Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70371026)
关键词 运筹学 多属性群决策 偏序 偏好 线性扩张 operations research multiple attribute group decision-making partial order preference linear extensions
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Gray P,Nunmaker J K.Group decision support systems[C].//Gray P,Jurison.Productivity in the Office and the Factory.New York:Boyd and Fraser,1995:106-117.
  • 2Iz PH.Two multiple criteria group support systems based on mathematical programming and ranking methods[J].Eur.J.Opl.Res.,1992,(61):245-253.
  • 3Boiney L G.When efficient is insufficient:faimess in decisions affecting a group[J].Mgmt.Sci.,1995,(41):1523-1537.
  • 4Yan H,Wei OL.Determining compromise weights for group decision making[J].J Opl Res Soc,2002,(53):680-687.
  • 5Birkhoff G.Lattice Theory (Volume XXV)[M].Providence:American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications,1973:1-280.
  • 6Dorte Lerche,Peter B Sorensen.Evaluation of the ranking probabilities for partial orders based on random linear extensions[J].Chemosphere,2003,(93):981-992.
  • 7郭春香,郭耀煌.属性具有不同形式偏好信息的群决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(1):63-65. 被引量:23
  • 8郭春香,郭耀煌.基于偏序偏好的多属性群决策问题的综合权重[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(7):1243-1246. 被引量:12
  • 9Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E.Linguistic decision analysis:steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,115:67-82
  • 10Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E.Choice functions and mechanisms for Linguistic preference relations[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2000,120:223 -239.

二级参考文献30

  • 1郭春香,郭耀煌.具有区间数的多目标格序决策方法研究[J].预测,2004,23(5):71-73. 被引量:23
  • 2郭春香,郭耀煌.独立决定和非二元性选择函数的Arrow不可能性定理[J].系统工程,2004,22(7):1-3. 被引量:3
  • 3王坚强.信息不完全的Fuzzy群体多准则决策的规划方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(11):1604-1608. 被引量:31
  • 4郭春香,郭耀煌.格序决策的格序化研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(5):463-466. 被引量:18
  • 5陈廷.决策分析(第一版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.1-120.
  • 6Delgado M, Herrera F, Hemera-Viextnm E. et al. Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 1998,107 : 177 - 194.
  • 7Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Vio3nra E. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy, preference relations[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systetrrs, 1998,97:33- 48.
  • 8XU Ze-shui, WEI Cui-ping. A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process [J]. European Jourrml of Operational Research,1999,116:443 - 449.
  • 9Noel Bryan, Ayodele Mobolurin.Am action learning ewduation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,96:379 - 386.
  • 10Hawng C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making[M]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, 1981. 1 - 107.

共引文献31

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部