期刊文献+

新古典增长模型:一个重新表述 被引量:1

Neoclassical Growth Models:A Reformulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 各类新古典增长模型在现有教科书中的表述形式存在很大的差异:无技术进步和外生技术进步的模型分别使用"劳均资本"和"有效劳均资本"的动态方程,内生技术进步的模型则使用"产出资本比"的动态方程。本文统一使用"产出资本比"和"消费资本比"变量对代表性的新古典增长模型,如索洛-斯旺模型、拉姆齐-卡斯-库普曼斯模型和卢卡斯模型,进行了重新表述。这种重新表述与现有教材的表述相比,具有两个明显的优点:第一,各种新古典增长模型在表述上具有数学形式上的一致性,这种一致性能够更加清晰地显示各个模型之间的继承与发展关系;第二,本文清楚地揭示新古典增长模型的核心结论是证明均衡产出资本比与消费资本比的存在且稳定,这是模型其它所有结论的基础。 Large disparities can be found in textbooks' treatments of different neoclassical growth models. Models without technical progress and with exogenous technical progress deliver themselves of dynamic equations of capital per labor and capital per efficient labor, respectively. Models with endogenous technical progress, however, make consistent use of dynamic equations of output-capital ratio. Employing two variables output-capital ratio and consumption ratio, we reformulate representative neoclassical growth models, including Solow-Swan model, Ramsey- Cass-Koopmans model, and Lucas model.Compared with existing expression, our reformulations have two distinct merits. First, our expressions for various models are consistent in their mathematical forms, and this consistence shows the clear-cut relationship of inheritance and development among various models. Second, our reformulation reveals distinctly that the core conclusion of neoclassical growth models is to verify the existence and stability of equilibria for output-capital ratio and consumption ratio, which form the base for all other conclusions.
出处 《南开经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期37-50,共14页 Nankai Economic Studies
关键词 新古典增长模型 产出资本比 消费资本比 Neoclassical Growth Model Output-Capital Ratio Consumption-Capital
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Barro, Robert J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill, 1995.
  • 2Barro, Robert J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. Economic Growth (2^nd) . New York: McGraw Hill, 2004: 44.
  • 3Caselli, Francesco and James Feyrer. The Marginal Product of Capital. CEP Discussion Papers dp0735, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, 2006.
  • 4Cass, David. Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation. Review of Economic Studies, 1965, 32 ( July ) : 233-40.
  • 5DeLong, J. Bradford. Macroeconomics, McGraw-Hill, 2003.
  • 6Easterly, W., and Levine, R. It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models. World Bank Economic Review, 2001, 15 ( 2 ) : 177-219.
  • 7Gundlach, Erich. The Solow Model in the Empirics of Growth and Trade. Kiel Working Paper No 1294, 2006.
  • 8Inada Ken-Ichi. On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth: Comments and a Generalization. Review of Economic Studies, 1963, 30 ( June ) , 119-27.
  • 9Jones, Charls I. A Note on the Closed-Form Solution of the Solow Model. Hppt: //elsa. berkeley. edu/-chad/closedform.pdf, 2000.
  • 10Jones, Charls I. and Dean Scrimgeour. The Steady-state Growth Theorem: Understanding Uzawa ( 1961 ). Review of Economics and Statistics, Forthcoming, 2006.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部