领导行为与领导有效性关系的比较研究被引量：15

A Comparative Study on the Relationship between Leadership and Leader Effectiveness

下载PDF

导出

摘要采用随机抽样的方式对中国企业的员工进行问卷调查,在比较分析中国式变革型领导、交易型领导和家长式领导行为的基础上,揭示了三种领导行为与领导有效性之间的关系。结果显示,中国式变革型领导、交易型领导和家长式领导行为都对领导有效性具有预测作用,变革型领导相对于交易型领导和家长式领导而言,对于领导有效性的预测效果更强,而交易型领导和家长式领导对于领导有效性的预测效果孰强孰弱则很难判断。 These authors have conducted survey on respondents in Chinese enterprises. Based on the comparative study of transactional leadership, transformational leadership and paternalistic leadership, these authors have analyzed the relationship between these leaderships and leader effectiveness, drawn the conclusion that these leaderships can predict leader effectiveness, and transformational leadership has stronger predictive effect on leader effectiveness than the other two leaderships do.

作者吴敏黄旭阎洪徐玖平

机构地区四川大学公共管理学院香港理工大学工商管理学院

出处《软科学》 CSSCI 2007年第5期5-9,共5页 Soft Science

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70701024) 四川省教育厅人文社会科学重点研究基地四川应用心理学研究中心项目(GSXL-62026)

关键词变革型领导行为交易型领导行为家长式领导行为领导有效性 transactional leadership transformational leadership paternalistic leadership leadership effectiveness comparison

分类号 C933 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Ho D Y F.Filial Piety,Authoritarian Moralism,and Cognitive Conservatism in Chinese Societies[J].Genetic,Social and General Psychology Monograghs,1996,120:347-365.
2Bass B M,Avolio B J.MLQ,Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire:Leader Form,Rater Form,and Scoring Key for MLQ Form 5x-short[M].Redwood City,Calif.:Mind Garden,2nd ed.,2000.
3Cheng X P,Farh J L.The Effectiveness of Transational and Transformational Leader Behavior in Chinese Organizations:Evidence form Taiwan[J].Academy of Management,Chicago,1999.
4李超平,时勘.变革型领导与领导有效性之间关系的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):115-117. 被引量：84
5李超平,孟慧,时勘.变革型领导对组织公民行为的影响[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):175-177. 被引量：62
6Cammann C,Fichman M,Jenkins D,Klesh J.The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire[M].Unpublished Manuscript,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,1979.
7Allen N J,Meyer J P.Affective,Continuance,and Normative Commitment to the Organization:An Examination of Construct Validity[J].Journal of Vocational Behavior,1996,49:252-276.
8Liang K G.Fairness in Chinese Organizations[M].Old Dominion University,1999.
9Cheng B S,Jen C K,Chang H F,Kuo C C.The Dyadic Relationships in Taiwan's Enterprise Network:Formation and Effectiveness of Relationship[J].Chinese Journal of Psychology,1997,39 (1):75-92.
10Farh J L,Cheng B S.A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations[J].Indegeous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies,2000,13:127-180.

二级参考文献13

1李超平,时勘.变革型领导的结构与测量[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):803-811. 被引量：459
2[1]Bass, B. M. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expecta- .tions. New York: Free Press, 1985
3[2]Avolio. B. J.,Bass B M.. Jung, D. 1. Re- Examining the Components of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, t999,72: 441- 462
4[3]Tejeda, M. J. , Scandura, T. A., Pillai. R. The MLQ Revisited: Psychometric Properties and Recommendations. Leadership Quarterly,2001,12:31 - 52
5[4]Den Hartog, D. N. , Van Muijen, J. J. , Koopman, P. L..Transactional Versus Transformational Leadership:An Analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1997,70:19 - 34
6[5]Lowe, K. B. , Kroeck, K. G. , Sivasubramaniam, N. Effectiveness of Correlates of Transformational and Transactional Leadership:A Meta- Analytic Review of the MLQ Literatu re. Leadership Quarterly, 1996,7: 385 - 425
7[6]Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. J. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1996
8[7]Arbuckle, J. L. , Wothke, W. Amos 4.0 User' s Guide.Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation, 1999
9[8]Kishton,J. M., Widaman, K. F. Unidimensional Versus Domain Representative Parceling of Questionnaire Items: An Empirical Example. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 1994,54: 757 - 765
10[9]Bollen, K. A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables.New York: Wiley, 1989