摘要
以英国为代表的西方发达国家的基础设施大多经历了民营化-国有化-民营化的制度变迁。而美国一直由民间部门占据基础设施供给的主导地位。对英美两国基础设施产权制度变革背景的回顾、评论与反思表明,基础设施可以由政府部门提供也可以由民间部门提供,基础设施的产权制度安排必须与一国的经济发展阶段、施政哲学及原有的管制制度基础相适应和衔接。管制成本与收益的比较决定了基础设施最终的产权制度安排。
Delegated by the United Kingdom, the western developed countries' infrastructure mostly has experienced the Privatization -Nationlization- Privatization system reform. American private department always accounts for the majority of infrastructure supply.To review,comment and rethinking the background of the two countries' different settlement of property of infrastructure shows that, infrastructrue can be supplied by both government and private department, the settlement of property system in infrastructure must adapt to the country's development phrase,administration philosophy and intrinsic regulation system. Comparation of regulation cost and income decide the final property system of infrastructure.
出处
《改革》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第10期85-89,共5页
Reform
关键词
基础设施
产权
制度比较
民营化
管制
infrastructure, property, system comparation, privatization, regulation