摘要
黄宗羲编选《明文海》、《明文授读》时,误将明代嘉靖至万历时期徐显卿所作的《与同年诸翰林论文书》一文置于成化至正德时期的徐祯卿名下,后来许多研究者便据此认为徐祯卿的诗文理论"充满悖论",并试图为他这种根本不存在的所谓"悖论"强行解释,这是不可能成立的。
The two collections of the Sea of the Ming Prose and the Selected Ming Prose for Reading compiled by Huang Zongxi mistake Xu Zhenqing as the author of the article the Discussing-letter~ on Prose and Poetry Production with the Candidates Who Passed the Imperial Examination and Entered the Hanlin Academy in the Same Year whose author-rights is actually Xu Xianqing of the Jiajing to Wanli reigns of the Ming Dynasty. The book of the Collections of Rhetoric Materials in Classic Chinese by Zheng Dian and Tan Quanji follow the trail of this mistake and thus leads to the astonishingly wrong conclusions in the history of Chinese Poetic Aesthetics by Zhuang Yan and Zhang Zhu and the Discussion on Xu Zhenqing's Art of Poetry Creation by Wang Yingzhi. In her paper of Xu Zhenqing's complex of landscape, Yin Yanmei struggled to give a convincing explanation to the so-called "contradictory theory on the production of poetry and prose by Xu Zhenqing" is actually of non-meaning for her wrongly adopted materials.
出处
《古籍整理研究学刊》
2007年第5期84-86,共3页
Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies
关键词
《与同年诸翰林论文书》
徐祯卿
徐显卿
黄宗羲
the Discussing-letter on Prose and Poetry Production with the Candidates Who Passed the Imperial Examination and Entered the Hanlin Academy in the Same Year
Xu Zhenqing
Xu Xianqing
Huang Zongxi