期刊文献+

英汉语用模糊的差异

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文力图探讨英汉语用模糊的差异性。文章利用英汉语料,特别是汉语语料具体探讨了英汉语用模糊的文化差异:社会等差性,包括男女差别、长幼差别和社会地位的差别。最后在语用模糊分类中考察英汉语用模糊的差异,揭示了其本质也是社会等差的问题。
作者 岑群霞
出处 《阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第5期76-78,共3页 Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献38

  • 1俞东明.语用学定义与研究范畴新探[J].浙江大学学报(社会科学版),1993,23(4):104-115. 被引量:65
  • 2何兆熊,蒋艳梅.语境的动态研究[J].外国语,1997,20(6):17-23. 被引量:291
  • 3Leech, Geoffrey (2003), 'Towards an anatomy of politeness in communication', International Journal of Pragmatics 14, 101-123.
  • 4Levinson, Stephen C. (1983), Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Liu, Runqing (1986), The Politeness Principle and A Dream of Red Mansions. Unpublished MPhil thesis, Lancaster University.
  • 6Mao, LuMing Robert (1994), 'Beyond politeness theory: 'Face' revisited and renewed,' Journal of Pragmatics 21, 451-86.
  • 7Matsumoto, Yoshiko (1989), 'Politeness and conversational universals - observations from Japanese', Multilingua, 8, 207-221.
  • 8Miller, R. A. (1967), The Japanese Language. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • 9Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen (1978), 'Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In: Esther N. Goody, ed., Questions and Politeness, 56-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Reissued 1987 with corrections, new introduction and new bibliography, as a book entitled Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.).
  • 10Brown, Roger W., and Gilman, Albert (1960), 'Pronouns of power and solidarity'. In T. A. Sebeok(ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253-276. Reprinted in P. Giglioli (ed.)(1972), Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, pp. 252-82.

共引文献344

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部