期刊文献+

短期Bi-PAP通气治疗老年急性心源性肺水肿

Treatment of Short-time Bi-level Positive Airways Pressure in Elderly Patients with Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】观察短期Bi-PAP通气治疗老年急性心源性肺水肿临床疗效。【方法】老年急性心源性肺水肿病人23例,随机分为常规治疗组12例,Bi-PAP组11例,比较Bi-PAP通气及常规吸氧治疗的疗效,并观察Bi-PAP通气对心脏功能的影响。【结果】Bi-PAP通气组经治疗后,30 min至3 h后呼吸困难开始好转,最快10 min,血气指标改善多在1~3 h。常规治疗组治疗后2~4 h呼吸困难好转,血气指标改善多在3~4h;两组比较,Bi-PAP组治疗有效率及达到有效所需时间优于常规治疗(P〈0.05),好转率差异无显著性,但达到好转所需时间短(P〈0.05),气管插管率差异无显著性。Bi-PAP组3例病人发生面罩局部皮肤损伤,常规治疗组无并发症发生(P〈0.05)。使用Bi-PAP通气治疗4 h后,左室射血分数及E/A差异无显著性,但后Tei较上机前有提高(P〈0.05)。【结论】早期应用Bi-PAP可较快地缓解心源性肺水肿的临床症状,并可改善心脏功能。 [Objective]To investigate the role of hi-level positive airway pressure(hi-PAP) mechanical ventilation in treatment of elderly patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. [Methods]Twenty three elderly patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema were randomly assigned to conventional oxygen therapy or Bi-PAP mechanical ventilation,effects of the two treatment ways,the role of Bi-PAP on heart function were investigated.[Results]In Bi-PAP group, after the administration of ventilation, the dyspnea was reduced in 30min-3 h, blood gas index improved in 1-3h. In conventional oxygen therapy group, the dyspnea was reduced in 1-3 h, blood gas index improved in 3-4 h. In Bi-PAP group, effective rate was higher, but the time needed to improve was shorter,3 patients developed minor facial erythema as a result of the face mask, Tel increased after treatment. [Conclusion]In elderly patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, noninvasive ventilation can decrease pulmonary edema more quickly, at the same time, improve heart function.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2007年第10期1656-1658,1661,共4页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 水肿 心源性/治疗 急性病 正压呼吸 edema,cardiac/TH acute disease positive pressurerespiration
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Maaip J,Roque M,Sanehez B,et al.Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema,systematic review and meta-analysis[J].JAMA,2005,294(24):3124-3130.
  • 2Park M,Sangean MC,Volpe MS,et al.Randomized,prospective trial of oxygen,continuous positive airway pressure,and bilevel positive airway pressure by face mask in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema[J].Crit Care Med,2004,32:2407-2415.
  • 3Mehta S,Jay GD,Woolard RH,et al.Randomized,prospec tive trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema[J].Crit Care Med,1997,25:620-628.
  • 4Crane S D,Elliott M W,Gilligan P,et al.Randomised controlled comparison of continuous positive airways pressure,bilevel non-invasive ventilation,and standard treatment in emergency department patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema[J].Eraerg Med J,2004,21:155-161.
  • 5Bruch C,Schmermund A,Marin D,et al.Tei index in patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure[J].Eur,Heart J,2000,21(22):1888-1895.
  • 6Paulsen SH,Jensen SE,Tei C,et al.Value of the Doppler in dex of myocardial performance in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2000,13(8):723-730.
  • 7Chadda K,AnnaneD,Hart N,et al.Cardiac and respiratory continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiac pulmonary edema[J].Crit Care Med,2002,30:2457-2461.
  • 8Mehta S,Jay GD,Woolard RH,et al.Randomized,prospecrive trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema[J].Crit Care Med,1997,25:620-628.
  • 9Park M,Lorenzi-Filho G.Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema[J].Cinics,2006,61(3):247-252.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部